- From: Christine Connors <cjmconnors@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 18:38:49 -0400
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Cc: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
I think having it as an option for direct or 3rd party use is a fine idea. After all, many news publishers have a tag for feeds of 'strange' news like Reuters' Oddly Enough, why not take it a step further? Christine Sent from my iPad On Apr 29, 2012, at 16:43, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote: > (disclaimer: thinking out loud) > > A smart-enough-to-know-better friend who shall remain nameless just > re-shared this link, having given it a quick check over (by searching) > and it looked real enough. At first glance it was Onion-esque but > wasn't obviously one of theirs, so got re-shared: > > http://www.freewoodpost.com/2012/03/13/mitt-romney-i-can-relate-to-black-people-my-ancestors-once-owned-slaves/ > > The article is completely false, as > http://www.freewoodpost.com/disclaimer/ indicates. If you view > source, you see itemtype="http://schema.org/Article" though (and a > load more metadata, ogp etc). > > I was wondering whether an addition such as > http://schema.org/SatiricalArticle could ever get traction. > > My initial conclusion is 'no', ... since most of the obvious > applications of 'SatiricalArticle' would likely slow the viral spread > of fake outrageous news around the Web, and so get little support from > publishers like the above, or > http://www.landoverbaptist.org/ http://christwire.org/ > http://www.theonion.com/ http://stuffwhitepeoplelike.com/ etc. But you > never know, there might be some other incentives (e.g. disclaimers?) > that could support such an idea. > > So I thought I'd float the suggestion. If anyone here happens to know > such publishers, I'm curious of their perspective. Would a > machine-readable indicator of 'satire' be interesting to any of them? > Presumably they get much of their traffic from controversy caused by > reposting shocking "news". Of course there's always scope for that > same metadata to be created by third parties, but that's an old old > story (http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-PICS-labels/ etc). > > cheers, > > Dan >
Received on Monday, 30 April 2012 11:52:22 UTC