- From: Bob Ferris <zazi@smiy.org>
- Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2011 11:03:59 +0200
- To: public-vocabs@w3.org
Hello again,
I initialised a Wiki page for collecting and discussing CV schemata, see
http://www.w3.org/wiki/CVSchemata
I'll try to fill the existing vocabulary-related page stubs ASAP.
Cheers,
Bo
PS: feel free to contribute ;)
On 10/8/2011 10:32 AM, Bernard Vatant wrote:
> Hi all
>
> See also
> http://labs.mondeca.com/dataset/lov/details/vocabularySpace_People.html
> Where previously quoted vocabularies plus a couple of other ones are listed.
>
> Feel free to ping me if you are aware of anything missing/wrong in this
> space :)
>
> Bernard
>
> 2011/10/8 Bob Ferris <zazi@smiy.org <mailto:zazi@smiy.org>>
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose another FOAF-related Semantic Web ontology
> that can deal with certain features of a CV, such as describing
> skills, expertises, and interests, however, it was not designed to
> fully represent all characteristics that can be covered by a CV
> (see, e.g., [3]). This vocabulary is called the Cognitive
> Characteristics Ontology [1] and includes modelling capacities to
> describe cognitive pattern in an easy and short way via simple
> binary relations, or in a more complex way via n-ary relations with
> weightings, dynamics etc. (which can finally related to each other).
> You might also consider the ongoing criticism re. the modelling of
> the RDF Resume Vocabulary (see, e.g., [2], or former discussions re.
> that topic on the FOAF-dev mailing list).
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Bo
>
>
> [1] http://purl.org/ontology/cco/__core#
> <http://purl.org/ontology/cco/core#>
> [2]
> http://lists.foaf-project.org/__pipermail/foaf-dev/2011-__September/010760.html
> <http://lists.foaf-project.org/pipermail/foaf-dev/2011-September/010760.html>
> [3]
> http://lists.foaf-project.org/__pipermail/foaf-dev/2011-__September/010771.html
> <http://lists.foaf-project.org/pipermail/foaf-dev/2011-September/010771.html>
>
> On 10/7/2011 11:06 PM, Dan Brickley wrote:
>
> +Cc: Uldis, who worked on this topic a while back
>
> 2011/10/7 George Katsanos<gkatsanos@gmail.com
> <mailto:gkatsanos@gmail.com>>:
>
> Dear all,
> Wouldn't it be possible to have a schema "template" (type?)
> for semantically
> describing CV's? It would also be a good opportunity for the
> job recruiting
> market to adopt this standard as currently the situation is
> chaotic between
> different file formats.
>
>
> There has been a little discussion of this already, e.g.
> http://groups.google.com/__group/schemaorg-discussion/__browse_thread/thread/__b7b6f259bd726047/__f991c2097fd08667?lnk=gst&q=CV#__f991c2097fd08667
> <http://groups.google.com/group/schemaorg-discussion/browse_thread/thread/b7b6f259bd726047/f991c2097fd08667?lnk=gst&q=CV#f991c2097fd08667>
>
> Let's break this into two parts. First, what's out there in terms of
> existing vocabularies, standards and data. Secondly, whether the
> Schema.org project (or others) decide to pick this up and include
> directly.
>
> Can I persuade you to help test out our new tooling by getting
> set up
> with a W3C account (http://www.w3.org/Help/__Account/
> <http://www.w3.org/Help/Account/>) and doing some
> background research in the Wiki? Just make a page near
> http://www.w3.org/wiki/__WebSchemas
> <http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas> and link it (we should sort
> out a
> category structure at some point...).
>
> Some related work:
>
> * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/__Description_of_a_Career
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Description_of_a_Career> ("designed to
> be compatible with the European curriculum (Europass) ")
> http://schemapedia.com/__schemas/doac
> <http://schemapedia.com/schemas/doac>
> * http://rdfs.org/resume-rdf/
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/__Europe/events/foaf-galway/__papers/pp/extending_foaf_with___resume/
> <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe/events/foaf-galway/papers/pp/extending_foaf_with_resume/>
> * Europass / CV,
> http://europass.cedefop.__europa.eu/europass/home/__vernav/Europass+Documents/__Europass+CV.csp
> <http://europass.cedefop.europa.eu/europass/home/vernav/Europass+Documents/Europass+CV.csp>
> http://myeurocv.com/
>
> As usual, the Microformats community have already been quite
> active in
> researching this topic; you should check out
> http://microformats.org/wiki/__resume-formats
> <http://microformats.org/wiki/resume-formats> and if you prefer
> to keep
> notes in their (public domain licensed) wiki, that's great; just
> drop
> in a link from the W3C page. Or add to both.
>
> The hardest problem here will be scoping. We will want some way of
> describing topics of people's expertise, without including a giant
> enumeration of all skill areas.
>
> A few brief points:
>
> SKOS
> I'd encourage the use of SKOS here, since the library world have
> already created a collaborative map of most of these topics, via
> thesauri and subject classification schemes, most of which are now
> being shared in RDF via SKOS. So for example, see
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/__wiki/SKOS/Datasets
> <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/SKOS/Datasets> or
> http://thedatahub.org/dataset?__tags=format-skos
> <http://thedatahub.org/dataset?tags=format-skos> to see a high level
> overview of the SKOS datasets that are out there. In SKOS, we
> already
> have the Library of Congress assigning the URI
> http://id.loc.gov/authorities/__sh85086421#concept
> <http://id.loc.gov/authorities/sh85086421#concept> to the notion of
> "Model Theory". So if someone (e.g. Pat Hayes) wanted to record such
> expertise in their CV/resume, ideally we could re-use such a list of
> topics (and some would build nice auto-completion tooling to support
> data entry).
>
> LRMI
> http://wiki.creativecommons.__org/LRMI
> <http://wiki.creativecommons.org/LRMI>
> "The Learning Resource Metadata Initiative is a project co-led
> by the
> Association of Educational Publishers and Creative Commons to
> build a
> common metadata vocabulary for educational resources."
> ...the overlap here is around describing skills and topics of
> expertise; either those required to understand some learning
> materials
> (eg. what knowledge do I need, to understand
> http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/__mathematics/18-06-linear-__algebra-spring-2010/video-__lectures/
> <http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-06-linear-algebra-spring-2010/video-lectures/>
> ? or what knowledge have I gained, if I do the online class at
> http://ml-class.org/ ?)
>
> ODF 1.2
> http://rdfa.info/2011/10/06/__odf-1-2-approved-as-standard-__now-with-rdfa/
> <http://rdfa.info/2011/10/06/odf-1-2-approved-as-standard-now-with-rdfa/>
> http://www.robweir.com/blog/__2011/09/odf12-approved.html
> <http://www.robweir.com/blog/2011/09/odf12-approved.html>
> "Open Document Format (ODF) 1.2 has been approved. It is now an
> OASIS
> Standard."
> It uses RDFa, see
> http://www.robweir.com/blog/__2007/10/odf-enters-semantic-__web.html
> <http://www.robweir.com/blog/2007/10/odf-enters-semantic-web.html>
> ... real world resumes and CVs are created using wordprocessing
> tools.
> It would be worthwhile looking at the related standards in this
> area,
> and possibility for tool support e.g. via CV/resume templates.
>
>
> Finally, from the Schema.org perspective, if you want to propose
> something for inclusion, take a look through
> http://schema.org/docs/full.__html
> <http://schema.org/docs/full.html> to understand where it might
> fit, how
> it relates to other areas of vocabulary. But the most important
> thing
> is the background research and some practical examples.
>
> I know a lot of folk are interested in this topic and there are
> a few
> more projects and initiatives I didn't list in this quick email
> (e.g.
> around describing jobs and training opportunities). It is worth
> collecting up background materials.
>
> With my FOAF project "hat" on, I'd really love to see progress
> in this
> area, and think that SKOS is probably the biggest and most
> interesting
> contribution that is missing from previous standards work....
Received on Saturday, 8 October 2011 09:05:03 UTC