Re: Why not publish the RDF/RDFS for the schema.org site?

• From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
• Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 18:35:52 +0100
• To: Jim Rhyne <jrhyne@thematix.com>
• Cc: public-vocabs@w3.org
• Message-ID: <CAFNgM+aP_kcLt_jhV7yq59epy+DLtfO2RRadYy5rajXvUJCpyw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Jim,

On 8 November 2011 18:09, Jim Rhyne <jrhyne@thematix.com> wrote:
> Apologies if this has been answered, but I don't see it in the archives, wiki or in any of the schema.rdfs.org documentation.
> For those of us interested in tools for creating schema.org compliant markup, why can’t we get the source used to create the site directly from the site instead of having to get a derived copy from schema.rdfs.org?
> Thanks for the answer.

The internal workflow is a little involved, and evolving. For now it
is probably best to take the RDFS/OWL and/or Microdata exports that
are linked from http://schema.org/docs/datamodel.html ...but yes,
you're not the first to ask for this, and making it simpler to do
things with the schema is certainly an important goal.

cheers,

Dan

Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2011 17:36:27 UTC