On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>wrote: > > On 4 Nov 2011, at 21:28, Daniel Dulitz wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 14:17, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> > wrote: > >> I'd love to know whether there are any consumers of schema.org markup > that are or plan to aggregate data across different sites to create a view > of information about the same thing, and indeed whether there are any > publishers who are generating schema.org markup with common @itemids or > urls… > > > > One could imagine that consumers like search engines might do something > like you describe. :-) > > One could *imagine* so, yes :) I suppose I was fishing a bit because of > course if a search engine *was* doing that then it would picking up > information in different languages about those things, and it would want to > preserve the language of the information so that they could present > something useful back to the users. And that would be a good example for > Hixie on the bug on microdata language handling [1]... > In as much as Hixie's response is it's "up to the vocabulary" and what most everyone seems to want is the same -- use the existing DOM mechanisms, so overall page language with @lang for overriding specific nodes -- should we just state that's what schema.org processors will do (I know of at least one implementer who had that expectation :-)? > Any concrete examples of this, or even statements of intent, would be > useful. > > Thanks, > > Jeni > > [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14470 > -- > Jeni Tennison > http://www.jenitennison.com > > >
Received on Saturday, 5 November 2011 17:29:26 UTC