- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 06:55:07 -0500
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@robineko.com>
- Cc: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>, public-vision-newstd@w3.org
On 18 Oct 2010, at 5:17 AM, Robin Berjon wrote: > On Oct 15, 2010, at 08:16 , Arnaud Le Hors wrote: >> I don't know whether the staff has experience with Drupal but that >> would be an obvious choice. >> I've used it myself on a recent project and it's quite amazing how >> much you get with little installation and configuration work. > > Drupal is a nice piece of software, but just installing it won't get > you that far. It takes a lot of point and click care and feeding > which I presume in this case would have to be handled largely by > volunteers. It also is a massive memory hog — I know hardware is > cheap, but it still needs to be there (and maintained, managed, > monitored, etc.). > > All this to say: before we jump into solution-space, maybe drafting > those minimal infrastructure requirements would help :) Here they are: http://www.w3.org/2010/07/community#infrastructure We probably have to go done one more level before we pick software, but that's the set of requirements in the short term. _ Ian -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Monday, 18 October 2010 11:55:11 UTC