- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 15:07:29 -0500
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Cc: public-vision-newstd@w3.org
On 23 Jul 2010, at 3:47 PM, Ian Jacobs wrote: Minutes available from today's call http://www.w3.org/2010/07/26-newstd-minutes.html _ Ian > > ====== > Agenda > > I) Quick review of AB discussion last week and high-level framing of > our work > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vision-newstd/2010Jul/0045 > > II) Preparing proposals for mid-August management meeting. The heads > of the five task forces (including me) are meeting with the CEO mid- > August. I will need proposals for that meeting. How will we get > those proposals? Here is a draft of the "template" that we should be > able to fill out for each proposal: > > ------ > Description. What is the proposal? > Rationale. What is the benefit for the organization in > implementing this recommendation? > Cost. What (if any) is the incremental cost to W3C to implement > the recommendation? Is there a natural way to diminish the cost by > refocusing existing people (i.e. reprioritization)? > Financial benefit. What (if any) income arises to W3C as a > consequence of the proposal? > Decision body. What is the most natural place for the proposal to > be approved/decided? Director? CEO? W3M? AB? AC? other? > Status and schedule. What is the level of maturity of the > proposal. Can it be thought of as reasonably complete? If it is > immature, what is the schedule to complete the proposal? > ------ > > Ideally there would be several volunteers to work on different > proposals, to be reviewed by the task force. If there are no > volunteers, I will work on the proposals and run them by you. > > > III) Infrastructure considerations. What should W3C make available > to groups in these categories: > - Editing and publishing tools (e.g., spec annotation mechanisms) > - Collaborative tools (annotation mechanisms, chat mechanisms, > feeds, microblogging, etc.) > - Tracking tools > > Here was an interesting list of ideas from the survey: > > " - "transparent idea submission/selection process (i.e. voting > \membership system) + Continuous Integration (i.e. Hudson) + > Dependency Management (i.e. Maven) + Source Code Management (i.e. > SVN & Bug Tracker) + Test Frameworks for its standards (xUnit: > jUnit, php- unit, pyunit, etc...) + senior/peer-reviewed code > acceptance process + good collaborative community tools such as > wikis/conference rooms/ scrum tools = successful software projects" > > This is not the usual list of tools we have for groups, which > includes: > * mailing lists > * IRC + bots > * tracker > * CVS > * wikis > * rss/atom feeds > > Do we have any priorities we want to communicate to the systems > team via our proposals? > > -- > Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ > Tel: +1 718 260 9447 > > -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Monday, 26 July 2010 20:07:31 UTC