- From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 10:56:25 +0000
- To: Karl Dubost <karl+w3c@la-grange.net>
- CC: Robin Berjon <robin@robineko.com>, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>, "public-vision-newstd@w3.org" <public-vision-newstd@w3.org>
They were directly active in the WG. Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329 -----Original Message----- From: Karl Dubost [mailto:karl+w3c@la-grange.net] Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 6:19 PM To: Paul Cotton Cc: Robin Berjon; Arnaud Le Hors; public-vision-newstd@w3.org Subject: Re: LC comments accountability Re: Ideas on simplification of process and operations Le 7 juil. 2010 à 21:53, Paul Cotton a écrit : >> 1. Implementers who are directly active and working on the specification usually give feedback during the WD phase. > > "Usually" is a very important word in this generalization. Were they directly active or just watching what was happening in the group? -- Karl Dubost Montréal, QC, Canada http://www.la-grange.net/karl/
Received on Saturday, 10 July 2010 10:57:06 UTC