- From: Alen Horvat <alen.horvat@netis.si>
- Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2024 09:39:14 +0000
- To: Brent Zundel <brent.zundel@gmail.com>
- Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, LAMPADARIOS Symeon <Symeon.LAMPADARIOS@ext.ec.europa.eu>, W3C Verifiable Credentials Working Group <public-vc-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <9D68543E-B838-429C-994E-2820797E1211@netis.si>
Additional info wrt EUDI legal text: (what we call verifier trust model fall under the embedded disclosure policies) In the context of the EUDIw, it is important to add that the “termsOfUse” clause could be an implementation of the Article 5a (5) : European Digital Identity Wallets shall, in particular: (e) in the case of the electronic attestation of attributes with embedded disclosure policies, implement the appropriate mechanism to inform the user that the relying party or the user of the European Digital Identity Wallet requesting that electronic attestation of attributes has the permission to access such attestation; The final version of the legal text: Regulation - EU - 2024/1183 - EN - EUR-Lex (europa.eu) <https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1183/oj?locale=en> BR, Alen > On 29 Jul 2024, at 22:20, Brent Zundel <brent.zundel@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, following up on this. > Can we still look forward to getting those examples? > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 10:11 PM Alen Horvat <alen.horvat@netis.si <mailto:alen.horvat@netis.si>> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Happy to hear! >> >> With Symeon we’ll try to provide examples for all the cases in the following 2 days (by Tuesday EOD). >> >> BR, Alen >> >> > On 21 Jul 2024, at 15:47, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com <mailto:msporny@digitalbazaar.com>> wrote: >> > >> > On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 1:17 AM Alen Horvat <alen.horvat@netis.si <mailto:alen.horvat@netis.si>> wrote: >> >> I believe this case is currently not defined in the specs. >> > >> > Thank you for the documentation and links Alen, speaking as an >> > Editor, I believe that what you have provided makes a solid case for >> > keeping the section in the specification. I'll try to drive consensus >> > in the WG around that goal. >> > >> > At a quick glance, I was struggling to find a concrete example that we >> > could include in the specification and while I could try to construct >> > one from the JSON Schema provided, I'd rather depend on EBSI to >> > provide a correct VCDM v2 example. Perhaps I missed an example in the >> > documentation you provided? >> > >> > That said, the direction the WG needs to take feels clear at this >> > point. We should close PR 1498 and, instead, focus on updating the >> > Terms of Use section to use an EBSI TrustFrameworkPolicy or >> > AccreditationPolicy example. I'll raise a PR and tag you so you can >> > provide further guidance. >> > >> > Apologies for interrupting your vacation; you don't need to respond >> > until you get back, now that we have a direction we have a month or so >> > to finalize the text. >> > >> > -- manu >> > >> > -- >> > Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ >> > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. >> > https://www.digitalbazaar.com/ >> >> >>
Received on Friday, 2 August 2024 14:52:53 UTC