- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2023 14:51:02 -0400
- To: Orie Steele <orie@transmute.industries>
- Cc: Markus Sabadello <markus@danubetech.com>, W3C VC Working Group <public-vc-wg@w3.org>, Wayne Cutler <wcutler@gsma.com>, Greg Bernstein <gregb@grotto-networking.com>
On Sun, Sep 17, 2023 at 12:33 PM Orie Steele <orie@transmute.industries> wrote: > When they collude (assuming they both understand RDF) they both learn, the other saw "_:uXqefD0KC4zrzEbFJhvdhYTGzRYW3RhjcQvfkpkWqDpc" As I suspected, your information is out of date, the identifiers of the form you are using as examples above are not generated for BBS (for the reasons you outline). See the following thread: https://github.com/w3c/vc-di-bbs/issues/84#issuecomment-1719859829 > Most of the commentary still applies to the approach being taken today with Data Integrity Proofs, its just JSON-LD instead of XML. That's already been responded to here (at the bottom): https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/850#issuecomment-1666291319 Your comments regarding how "green" an algorithm is have already been responded to here: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-credentials/2023Sep/0025.html -- manu -- Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. https://www.digitalbazaar.com/
Received on Sunday, 17 September 2023 18:51:47 UTC