- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 10:51:17 -0400
- To: Orie Steele <orie@transmute.industries>
- Cc: Drummond Reed <Drummond.Reed@gendigital.com>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Wayne Cutler <wcutler@gsma.com>, "Liaisons," <team-liaisons@w3.org>, Helene Vigue <hvigue@gsma.com>, W3C VC Working Group <public-vc-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 9:01 AM Orie Steele <orie@transmute.industries> wrote: > It sounds like they are interested in BBS but I don't know if they care if it's in a JSON, CBOR or JSON-LD envelope, or understand the differences. I did not read their request as prioritizing BBS+ based data integrity proofs. Quoting directly from the GSMA request: """ W3C to detail how BBS+ and ZKPs will be integrated in the global VC / VP ecosystem starting with the BBS Cryptosuite (https://github.com/w3c/vc-di-bbs) and to inform GSMA EIG about the timeline of their specification. """ > If a formal response from W3C is requested, does the working group need to do anything or is the decision with the W3C members or staff? The WG is typically involved in drafting the response with approval from the W3C Team... but it's possible that this has changed over the years. I defer to Ivan on the process, here. -- manu -- Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. https://www.digitalbazaar.com/
Received on Wednesday, 13 September 2023 14:52:01 UTC