- From: Orie Steele <orie@transmute.industries>
- Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2023 08:20:46 +0100
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: W3C Verifiable Credentials Working Group <public-vc-wg@w3.org>
Received on Saturday, 4 November 2023 07:21:01 UTC
Only 1 of these options is close to acceptable. Perhaps the most crucial part is that timing changes meaning and processing contexts as if they never change, while reflecting out hopes, is inconsistent with what we know to be true. Several of these labels are very misleading. I might propose weak and strong JSON-LD processing be added. I think it's harmful to imply JSON processing is valid for the core data model. OS On Fri, Nov 3, 2023, 6:00 PM Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > As mentioned on the VCWG call this week, we're going to poll the group > on what we should rename the "JSON Processing" section to: > > The VCDM has one data model now, which is JSON-LD. You can write > applications that only work with a specific set of credentials (e.g., > issuers, verifiers), or you can write applications that can work with > any credential (e.g., digital wallets). This poll is to pick the words > that we use to differentiate these situations: > > https://www.opavote.com/en/vote/5254957337935872 > > This poll will stay open for at least a week, and will most likely be > closed during the next main VCWG call (Wednesdaym November 15th). > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > https://www.digitalbazaar.com/ > >
Received on Saturday, 4 November 2023 07:21:01 UTC