- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 08:29:56 -0400
- To: "John, Anil" <anil.john@hq.dhs.gov>
- Cc: W3C Credentials CG <public-credentials@w3.org>
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 8:09 AM John, Anil <anil.john@hq.dhs.gov> wrote: > It is good to see this gap filled and I appreciate that there will now exist implementation approaches both for the near term and with a road map for the future, whichever credential proof formats one chooses to use to protect your credential. Yes, what we're going for here is to ensure that whatever formats one chooses (Data Integrity or JOSE), that there exist selective disclosure solutions for both NIST-compliant cryptography and for future-facing unlinkable cryptography (BBS), even if it will be a while before NIST officially recognizes BBS. > Looking forward to learning more of the details. Dave Longley is planning to share some of the thinking that went into the Data Integrity Selective Disclosure design and implementation at some point this week, so I expect that will help folks understand the benefits and drawbacks of the approach. We are also planning to do a compare/contrast between all of the selective disclosure solutions, as they have different designs that lead to different trade-offs, but want to make sure that comparison is fair and so are going to take a bit more time to make sure we've done our due diligence before releasing that analysis. It might be a good thing to work on at upcoming IIW or RWoT venues as I know there are a number of people that are curious about the differences and similarities between these mechanisms. -- manu -- Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. https://www.digitalbazaar.com/
Received on Tuesday, 30 May 2023 12:30:37 UTC