- From: Oliver Terbu <oliver.terbu@spruceid.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 21:34:41 +0100
- To: W3C VC Working Group <public-vc-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAP7TzjB_w8hnve1px5tDrFLCJKzo8KLM-RkcVOsU5iNWOJHtDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all, The VCWG has been working to define Holder Confirmation Method (aka Holder Binding and the term is being bikeshedded) normatively as a new extension point in the VCDM 2.0 standard: https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pull/1054 Since this is going to be a new extension point, there are no extension specifications for that extension point yet. However, most people use DID-Auth and PKI-based approaches for Holder Confirmation Methods in production. In our community and beyond, a number of specifications, presentations, and papers refer to DID Auth already. We know of a number of companies using DID-Auth as a Holder Confirmation Method in production around VCs. Since there is no formal definition of how DID-Auth can be used with the VCDM, it would help these companies if we could formalize a DID Auth-based Holder Confirmation Method in the VCWG that can be registered in the VC Directory. The formalization won't cover the DID-Auth protocol, it will only cover how to encode the DID in the VCDM and to verify the Holder Confirmation Method based on a received verifiable presentation. The effort will be low. To progress the work item, we need other companies that are interested in helping develop the spec within the VC WG, so please raise your hand by undersigning this letter: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Fdof-S7fhMzhzw8saldfIWLn8ybpVLbK4dvFOJYUNIA Why now? Because at the end of March, we will have a feature freeze, and if we want to make this work happen, we need your voice now. This will ensure that we have one Holder Confirmation Method fully defined and registered in the VC Directory. Thanks, Oliver Terbu
Received on Wednesday, 15 March 2023 20:35:06 UTC