- From: Shigeya Suzuki <shigeya@wide.ad.jp>
- Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2023 12:37:40 +0900
- To: "Manu Sporny" <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, "Orie Steele" <orie@transmute.industries>
- Cc: "Robin Berjon" <robin.berjon@gmail.com>, "W3C Chairs of VC WG" <group-vc-wg-chairs@w3.org>, "W3C VC Working Group" <public-vc-wg@w3.org>
Hi Manu, Orie, I will be at IETF 117, so I will help coordinate with other members (who will come?) to talk with ADs. shigeya On Sun, Jul 2, 2023, at 20:44, Manu Sporny wrote: > On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 6:30 PM Orie Steele <orie@transmute.industries> wrote: >> How are we ensuring that the work at IETF will be stable enough for the W3C to continue to reference. > > The current usage of multibase and multicodec in the Data Integrity > specifications is quite small. Specifically, we use two multibase > prefixes "z" and "u", and a handful of multicodec entries for ECDSA > and Ed25519 public keys. We currently state those values explicitly in > the specifications and that is all we need in order for the > specifications to be implementable. > > To put it another way, we don't have a blocking dependency on the > Multiformats work progressing at IETF on the same timeline that VCWG > is on. This has always been the case. Yes, it would be nice if the > IETF work was ready for us to reference in the VCWG work, but that is > not going to block the VCWG from being able to get to REC w/ our > specifications. > > At present, we're going through all the feedback that we got at IETF > 116 and responding to commenters on the IETF Multiformats mailing > list. We are then cleared, per the discussion at IETF 116, to spin up > a quick WG to publish the Multibase and Multihash specifications and > establish the registries at IETF. > > If folks want to help in that process, having a chat with Murray (or > other ADs that were involved in the discussion at IETF 116) during the > upcoming IETF on what processes are needed to spin the WG up is what's > needed next. NOTE: It was already approved to go to a WG at the last > dispatch and there was talk of a "fast process" to get it set up if > the community wanted it (which it seems to want to do), so the next > step is to find out exactly what this "fast process" is, get that > kicked off, and get the WG operational. > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > https://www.digitalbazaar.com/
Received on Monday, 3 July 2023 03:38:38 UTC