Re: [Minutes] VC WG 2022-11-23

I want to dig into how the scribing works.
Since these meetings are usually at a very difficult time for me I stick
with reading the transcripts to be up to date.
I have a responsibility to my role as invited expert.

But there are situations in the transcript where there is information lost.
For this particular example

There are two places I see people give +1 to Orie without Ories context
being documented. There is a comment that gives a small summary with
their +1, but I dont know if that is enough.
They also usually end very abruptly, feeling like there is something missed.

Is this scribing done by a human only or assisted by a robot?
Are there any current issues of the scribing process we want to improve or
implement that are on hold because of time?
ᐧ

On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 6:31 AM Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:

> Minutes are here:
>
> https://www.w3.org/2017/vc/WG/Meetings/Minutes/2022-11-23-vcwg
>
> Cheers
>
> ivan
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +33 6 52 46 00 43
>
>
>

-- 

*Snorre Lothar von Gohren Edwin*
Co-Founder & CTO, Diwala
+47 411 611 94
www.diwala.io
<http://www.diwala.io/>
*Stay on top of Diwala news on social media! **Facebook
<https://www.facebook.com/diwalaorg>** / **LinkedIn
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/diwala>** / **Instagram
<https://www.instagram.com/diwala_/>** / **Twitter
<https://twitter.com/Diwala>*