- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 18:23:50 -0400
- To: public-vc-wg@w3.org
On 3/15/22 11:00 AM, Brent Zundel (W3C Calendar) wrote: > VCWG Meeting ^Upcoming ^Confirmed 16 March 2022 Regrets, I have a speaking engagement that I thought wasn't going to conflict, but now does. > VCWG Registries [1] (15 min): I prefer that the WG state clearly what some of the input documents are expected to be for the registries, but will not object if we just keep it limited to the content in PR 101... defer to consensus of WG. > VCWG Charter Data Integrity [2] (10 min) I prefer that we specifically articulate that the Data Integrity and cryptosuite specifications must remain generalizable and not made to be specific to VCs. If we don't get some variation of the suggested language in, I'd like a confirmation from the group that none of the group is under the impression that we're going to harm the ability for the Data Integrity and cryptosuite specifications to be used for more generalized use cases (arbitrary signing of JSON-LD data, for example). Ultimately, I defer to the consensus of the WG. In other words, don't delay making decisions and closing issues on my account, even if you think I'd object. :) -- manu -- Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. News: Digital Bazaar Announces New Case Studies (2021) https://www.digitalbazaar.com/
Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2022 22:24:06 UTC