Re: [AGENDA] Verifiable Credentials Working Group (VCWG) Teleconference - 08 Sep 2021

I think this was poorly communicated in the past, which I take
responsibility for.

The v1.1 (editorial changes) can happen up until the end of the group. They
do not require wide review.

The v1.2 (substantive changes) need to be wrapped up by the beginning of
October (under our current timeline). This means we need all v1.2 PRs that
we want to include in the revised recommendation to be submitted within the
next week or so. This will give the CCG time to review them before we need
to merge so we can create a static document to share for wide review.



On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 9:45 PM Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
wrote:

> On 9/7/21 4:30 PM, Brent Zundel wrote:
> > 6-Review v1.1 Issues [4] (15 min)
>
> I have reviewed all v1.1 PRs and provided either approval or feedback.
>
> Regrets for the call tomorrow.
>
> Please discuss the hard deadline for the Editors to prepare a v1.1
> specification for publication. What date are we shooting for, again?
>
> Please also raise the issue that we should be cross-posting that the
> VCWG now has a standing weekly meeting to the CCG mailing list. I have a
> feeling that a lot of people still don't know that we're starting to
> meet again on a regular basis.
>
> -- manu
>
> --
> Manu Sporny
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> Our Verifiable Credential Deployments
> https://www.digitalbazaar.com/case-studies
>
>

-- 
Brent Zundel, Evernym
Principle Cryptography Engineer