Let's make sure we don't try to turn the (extremely brief) explainer into the spec itself. I believe our examples section in the explainer should only include the briefest, most common examples. For anything else people should look at the examples in the spec. Anything that is missing from the spec should be reported as an issue in the spec's GitHub repo as usual. -- dan On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 5:46 AM Christopher Allen < ChristopherA@lifewithalacrity.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 12:57 PM Smith, Ned <ned.smith@intel.com> wrote: > >> Ideally there would be examples of the other proof types. >> > > There are also some very important supplemental proofs like timestamps > (proof-of-existence) or proof-of-publication (more than existence) that can > be important. A key issue to to make sure we have a requirement that these > supplemental can be included in a VC, even if they are insufficient for > other proof purposes. > > -- Christopher Allen > >
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2019 12:29:05 UTC