- From: Reto Gmür <reto@factsmission.com>
- Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 09:37:30 +0000
- To: W3C Verifiable Claims Working Group <public-vc-wg@w3.org>
Hil all, Rereading vc-data-model I'm getting ab bit confused and I would appreciate someone helping me understand. In section 3.1 it seem that the claim is a graph. What confused me a bit is the statement that "To make the claim verifiable, more information must be added to the graph of information", because I would have imagined this graph being kind of the payload of the verifiable claim with a separation of the graph with the actual claim "Pat is over 21 and knows Sam, a student" from the statements making the authorship of this claim verifiable. Since nested graphs are not yet supported in RDF I wanted to look at the JSON-LD to see how this is solved (named graph or reification?). The JSON-LD however confused me even more. Looking at the example 12 in section 7.2.1 there is the triple: <http://example.gov/credentials/3732> <https://w3id.org/credentials#claim> <did:example:ebfeb1f712ebc6f1c276e12ec21> . But I don't see any other triple describing <did:example:ebfeb1f712ebc6f1c276e12ec21>. The JSON-Key "ageOver" doesn't resolves to a property. Shouldn't <did:example:ebfeb1f712ebc6f1c276e12ec21> be a named graph containing something: like :Pat :ageOver 21 ? A side question: what is the URI scheme "did"? As you can see, I'm a bit lost... Cheers, Reto FactsMission AG Linked Data for more facts and less noise.
Received on Saturday, 21 October 2017 09:38:11 UTC