Re: Preparing UC doc as FPWD

Presuming a publish date of June 6, and that the details I mentioned in the commit comments are acceptable, the UC doc is ready to go [1].

Status set to FPWD
issues to github.com/w3c/vc-use-cases
wgPatentURI set to https://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/98922/status <https://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/98922/status>
publishDate set to 2017-06-06
feedback to public-vc-wg, although leaving this blank would indicate GitHub issue tracker. This could also be public-vc-comments@w3.org <mailto:public-vc-comments@w3.org>, if that mailing list exists.
Update Introduction to replace the goal of the Task Force with elements from the Mission of the WG.
Changes required by Pub Rules checker.

Gregg Kellogg
gregg@greggkellogg.net

[1] https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/pull/503 <https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/pull/503>

> On May 26, 2017, at 2:10 PM, Daniel Burnett <danielcburnett@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Gregg, this all looks good to me.  I am on my way to the woods for the weekend, but if you still need to talk send me a number and I'll try whenever I'm near civilization.
> 
> -- dan
> 
> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 2:48 PM Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net <mailto:gregg@greggkellogg.net>> wrote:
> Dan, can we chat on IRC? #vcwg? I have some questions:
> 
> * I believe we decided to publish as FPWD. (Note that this is intended for rec-track documents, I’ve added a sentence to SOTD that notes it is intended to eventually be published as a NOTE).
> * Issues and so forth go to github.com/w3c/vc-use-cases <http://github.com/w3c/vc-use-cases>.
> * We need a wgPatentURI, I’ve used https://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/98922/status <https://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/98922/status>.
> * We can avoid the mailing list now and have comments come in to the GitHub repo, if we like. This is a new capability of ReSpec, apparently allowed by pubrules.
> 
> I’ll create a publication-snapshots directory, move the CG document there, and create a new timestamped directory for the FPWG.
> 
> Gregg Kellogg
> gregg@greggkellogg.net <mailto:gregg@greggkellogg.net>
> 
>> On May 26, 2017, at 10:43 AM, Daniel Burnett <danielcburnett@gmail.com <mailto:danielcburnett@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> The chairs would like for either Liam or one of the named editors (of which I am one) to volunteer to prep the Use Cases doc [1]  as a First Public Working Draft.  If you don't know what that is or how to do it, don't feel pressured to volunteer.  Everyone else, feel the pressure.
>> 
>> Volunteers?
>> 
>> -- dan
>> 
>> 
>> [1] https://w3c.github.io/vc-use-cases/ <https://w3c.github.io/vc-use-cases/>