Re: Subject Holder Relationship

I agree, very nice diagram.

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Kim Hamilton Duffy <kim@learningmachine.com
> wrote:

> Nice work David!
>
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 1:00 PM David Chadwick <D.W.Chadwick@kent.ac.uk>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Joe
>>
>> On second thoughts this is another example of holder acts4 subject if
>> the client subsequently validates the VC. But if the client relies on
>> the recruiter to validate the VC, then the client does not need the VC
>> so it is not an example of a VC use case
>>
>> Comments?
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>> On 19/12/2017 20:38, Joe Andrieu wrote:
>> > Nice.
>> >
>> > For the case of the holder acting for a verifier: a recruiter passing on
>> > verified credentials of a candidate to their client.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017, at 12:20 PM, David Chadwick wrote:
>> >> Hi Everyone
>> >>
>> >> given that today we discussed the topic of subject not being the
>> holder,
>> >> I thought I would try to classify the different types of VC that a
>> >> verifier might receive, given all the possible relationships between
>> >> subject, holder, issuer and verifier. I attach a jpeg picture that
>> >> depicts my first thoughts on how we might classify the different types
>> >> and/or ways that a VC might be presented to a verifier, in the shape of
>> >> a binary decision tree. I find the diagram useful in that it is trying
>> >> to capture the wide variety of possibilities, and eventually we will
>> >> need to cover them all in either the data model or protocols or both,
>> if
>> >> we are not to leave gaps in our specifications.
>> >>
>> >> If this is worth pursuing further then maybe this should be put on the
>> >> web somewhere, and/or distributed to the CCG as well - please advise.
>> >>
>> >> kind regards
>> >>
>> >> David
>> >>
>> >> Email had 1 attachment:
>> >>
>> >>  *
>> >>     |SubjectHolder.jpeg|
>> >>       95k (image/jpeg)
>> >
>> > --
>> > Joe Andrieu, PMP
>> >                      joe@legreq.com <mailto:joe@legreq.com>
>> > LEGENDARY REQUIREMENTS
>> >      +1(805)705-8651 <(805)%20705-8651>
>> > Do what matters.
>> >                    http://legreq.com <http://www.
>> legendaryrequirements.com>
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
> Kim Hamilton Duffy
> CTO & Principal Architect Learning Machine
> Co-chair W3C Credentials Community Group
> 400 Main Street Building E19-732, Cambridge, MA 02139
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=732,+Cambridge,+MA+02139&entry=gmail&source=g>
>
> kim@learningmachine.com | kimhd@mit.edu
> 425-652-0150 <(425)%20652-0150> | LearningMachine.com
>

Received on Wednesday, 20 December 2017 08:05:57 UTC