- From: =Drummond Reed <drummond.reed@evernym.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:05:29 -0800
- To: Kim Hamilton Duffy <kim@learningmachine.com>
- Cc: David Chadwick <D.W.Chadwick@kent.ac.uk>, public-vc-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAAjunnbJn_jAhOh71TPmAmA4a=JCRRFmDjuoDHxBaHe=RJ4+AQ@mail.gmail.com>
I agree, very nice diagram. On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Kim Hamilton Duffy <kim@learningmachine.com > wrote: > Nice work David! > > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 1:00 PM David Chadwick <D.W.Chadwick@kent.ac.uk> > wrote: > >> Hi Joe >> >> On second thoughts this is another example of holder acts4 subject if >> the client subsequently validates the VC. But if the client relies on >> the recruiter to validate the VC, then the client does not need the VC >> so it is not an example of a VC use case >> >> Comments? >> >> David >> >> >> On 19/12/2017 20:38, Joe Andrieu wrote: >> > Nice. >> > >> > For the case of the holder acting for a verifier: a recruiter passing on >> > verified credentials of a candidate to their client. >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017, at 12:20 PM, David Chadwick wrote: >> >> Hi Everyone >> >> >> >> given that today we discussed the topic of subject not being the >> holder, >> >> I thought I would try to classify the different types of VC that a >> >> verifier might receive, given all the possible relationships between >> >> subject, holder, issuer and verifier. I attach a jpeg picture that >> >> depicts my first thoughts on how we might classify the different types >> >> and/or ways that a VC might be presented to a verifier, in the shape of >> >> a binary decision tree. I find the diagram useful in that it is trying >> >> to capture the wide variety of possibilities, and eventually we will >> >> need to cover them all in either the data model or protocols or both, >> if >> >> we are not to leave gaps in our specifications. >> >> >> >> If this is worth pursuing further then maybe this should be put on the >> >> web somewhere, and/or distributed to the CCG as well - please advise. >> >> >> >> kind regards >> >> >> >> David >> >> >> >> Email had 1 attachment: >> >> >> >> * >> >> |SubjectHolder.jpeg| >> >> 95k (image/jpeg) >> > >> > -- >> > Joe Andrieu, PMP >> > joe@legreq.com <mailto:joe@legreq.com> >> > LEGENDARY REQUIREMENTS >> > +1(805)705-8651 <(805)%20705-8651> >> > Do what matters. >> > http://legreq.com <http://www. >> legendaryrequirements.com> >> > >> > >> >> -- > Kim Hamilton Duffy > CTO & Principal Architect Learning Machine > Co-chair W3C Credentials Community Group > 400 Main Street Building E19-732, Cambridge, MA 02139 > <https://maps.google.com/?q=732,+Cambridge,+MA+02139&entry=gmail&source=g> > > kim@learningmachine.com | kimhd@mit.edu > 425-652-0150 <(425)%20652-0150> | LearningMachine.com >
Received on Wednesday, 20 December 2017 08:05:57 UTC