- From: Adrian Gropper <agropper@healthurl.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 15:35:49 -0500
- To: David Chadwick <D.W.Chadwick@kent.ac.uk>
- Cc: Verifiable Claims Working Group <public-vc-wg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 19 December 2017 20:36:16 UTC
I find this very useful. Adrian On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 3:20 PM, David Chadwick <D.W.Chadwick@kent.ac.uk> wrote: > Hi Everyone > > given that today we discussed the topic of subject not being the holder, > I thought I would try to classify the different types of VC that a > verifier might receive, given all the possible relationships between > subject, holder, issuer and verifier. I attach a jpeg picture that > depicts my first thoughts on how we might classify the different types > and/or ways that a VC might be presented to a verifier, in the shape of > a binary decision tree. I find the diagram useful in that it is trying > to capture the wide variety of possibilities, and eventually we will > need to cover them all in either the data model or protocols or both, if > we are not to leave gaps in our specifications. > > If this is worth pursuing further then maybe this should be put on the > web somewhere, and/or distributed to the CCG as well - please advise. > > kind regards > > David > -- Adrian Gropper MD PROTECT YOUR FUTURE - RESTORE Health Privacy! HELP us fight for the right to control personal health data. DONATE: https://patientprivacyrights.org/donate-3/
Received on Tuesday, 19 December 2017 20:36:16 UTC