Comments on delivery context ontology

Here are some comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-dcontology-20090616/:


 

 

(1) Section 2.2 Normative Language for Conformance Requirements

 

It is not clear what it means if a class, property or instance is "not

normative".  Suggest saying something like "not normative concepts may be

implemented. If not implemented, these URIs must not be otherwise used."

 

 

(2) Class MmsClient

 

The abbreviation "MMS" is not explained in the whole document.

 

 

(3) Property id

 

There is a long list of subproperties of common:id?  Why are these

subproperties necessary?  Why not use common:id for all occurrences?

 

 

Thank you for your consideration,

Gottfried

 

___________________________________________________

 

 Dr. Gottfried Zimmermann

 ICT Accessibility Architect

  <http://www.accesstechnologiesgroup.com/> Access Technologies Group,
Germany

 Phone +49 7121 790806

___________________________________________________