Re: ISSUE-214: editorial: reference to relaxed path validation [wsc-xit] ( LC-2055)

 Dear Thomas Roessler ,

The Web Security Context Working Group has reviewed the comments you sent
[1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the Web Security Context: User
Interface Guidelines published on 24 Jul 2008. Thank you for having taken
the time to review the document and to send us comments!

The Working Group's response to your comment is included below.

Please review it carefully and let us know by email at
public-usable-authentication@w3.org if you agree with it or not before 26
January 2009. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a
specific solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If
such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to
raise a formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director
during the transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C
Recommendation Track.

Thanks,

For the Web Security Context Working Group,
Thomas Roessler
W3C Staff Contact

 1. http://www.w3.org/mid/20080813204100.F25A25F74D@stu.w3.org
 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-wsc-ui-20080724/


=====

Your comment on 5.4.1 TLS errors:
> ISSUE-214: editorial: reference to relaxed path validation [wsc-xit]
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/214
> 
> Raised by: Thomas Roessler
> On product: wsc-xit
> 
> In section 5.4.1, one reference to relaxed path validation has
> survived. Also, it's "has expired", not "has been expired."
> 
> (editorial)


Working Group Resolution (LC-2055):
The change was accepted: 
http://www.w3.org/2008/08/27-wsc-minutes.html
http://www.w3.org/2008/09/03-wsc-minutes.html

----

Received on Friday, 9 January 2009 20:03:13 UTC