- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 18:30:16 +0200
- To: public-usable-authentication@w3.org
- Cc: timeless@gmail.com
archiving, with permission
--
Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
----- Forwarded message from timeless <timeless@gmail.com> -----
From: timeless <timeless@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 11:03:00 +0300
Subject: Re: Web Security Context: User Interface Guidelines
Reply-To: timeless@gmail.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Bogosity: Unsure, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.500000, version=1.1.6
http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-wsc-ui-20080724/
initial spell checking after visual inspection flagged a word is done
by loading the text into data:text/html,<textarea rows=60 cols=85> in
Firefox 3.0.1 (en-US) and just looking for red squiggles.
> 6.1 Identity and Trust Anchor Signalling
> 6.4 Error handling and signalling
google says the web favors signaling 3:1 (Firefox says signalling
isn't a word{).
Wikipedia says:
signalling (UK spelling) or signaling (US spelling) has the
following meanings:
> [WSC-USECASES] documents the use cases and assumptions that underly this specification.
underlie or underlay
> Mike Beltzner, Joe Steele,Jan Vidar Krey, Maritza Johnson, Rachna Dhamija and Dan Schutzer.
space missing before "Jan"
> It has also benefitted from general public and working group commentary on earlier drafts.
benefited
> This specification also addresses products that might incporate changes to a web
incorporate
> acceptance was caused through a user interaction that happens whlie the user is
while
> those roots embody augmented assurance and can therefore be treated more favourably
> both display the "padlock" security indicator, and a possible "favorite icon"
As an American, I'd expect favorably....
> The identity of the top level resource vouches for the content of all dependant
dependent
=
> This specification addresses Web user agents as one class of product.
typically I expect "class of thing_s_" do you mean "a product class"?`
> 3. What broadly accepted practices are considered sufficient for a trust anchor to be deemed augmented assurance qualified.
> Web user agents MUST establish that a trust anchor is [Definition: AA-qualified ]
use "augmented assurance qualified" or "aa-qualified" but not both :)
----- End forwarded message -----
Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2008 16:30:52 UTC