- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 18:30:16 +0200
- To: public-usable-authentication@w3.org
- Cc: timeless@gmail.com
archiving, with permission -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> ----- Forwarded message from timeless <timeless@gmail.com> ----- From: timeless <timeless@gmail.com> To: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 11:03:00 +0300 Subject: Re: Web Security Context: User Interface Guidelines Reply-To: timeless@gmail.com X-Spam-Level: X-Bogosity: Unsure, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.500000, version=1.1.6 http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-wsc-ui-20080724/ initial spell checking after visual inspection flagged a word is done by loading the text into data:text/html,<textarea rows=60 cols=85> in Firefox 3.0.1 (en-US) and just looking for red squiggles. > 6.1 Identity and Trust Anchor Signalling > 6.4 Error handling and signalling google says the web favors signaling 3:1 (Firefox says signalling isn't a word{). Wikipedia says: signalling (UK spelling) or signaling (US spelling) has the following meanings: > [WSC-USECASES] documents the use cases and assumptions that underly this specification. underlie or underlay > Mike Beltzner, Joe Steele,Jan Vidar Krey, Maritza Johnson, Rachna Dhamija and Dan Schutzer. space missing before "Jan" > It has also benefitted from general public and working group commentary on earlier drafts. benefited > This specification also addresses products that might incporate changes to a web incorporate > acceptance was caused through a user interaction that happens whlie the user is while > those roots embody augmented assurance and can therefore be treated more favourably > both display the "padlock" security indicator, and a possible "favorite icon" As an American, I'd expect favorably.... > The identity of the top level resource vouches for the content of all dependant dependent = > This specification addresses Web user agents as one class of product. typically I expect "class of thing_s_" do you mean "a product class"?` > 3. What broadly accepted practices are considered sufficient for a trust anchor to be deemed augmented assurance qualified. > Web user agents MUST establish that a trust anchor is [Definition: AA-qualified ] use "augmented assurance qualified" or "aa-qualified" but not both :) ----- End forwarded message -----
Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2008 16:30:52 UTC