RE: Comments Universal Design review of WSC Draft

A quick addition to Bill's email; all issues (and the email thread from 
them) can be accessed via the public tracker link:
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/

          Mez





"Doyle, Bill" <wdoyle@mitre.org> 
Sent by: public-usable-authentication-request@w3.org
06/18/2007 11:09 PM

To
<public-usable-authentication@w3.org>
cc
<Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org>
Subject
RE: Comments Universal Design review of WSC Draft






 Al,
 
Thank you for your comments. I apologize for the delay in responding, a 
process for formally addressing public comments needed to be flushed out.
 
We're using Tracker to create Issues raised from public comment, this tool 
supports tracking, viewing discussion threads and resolutions. The 
following issues were generated from your email titled Universal Design 
review of WSC Draft dated April 4 2007.
 
ISSUE-34
Formal studies don't cover disability access adequately, use experts too -
(public comment)
ISSUE-35
information overload/underload -- no oneSizeFitsAll (public comment)
ISSUE-36
presentation norms -- no oneSizeFitsAll (from public comments)
ISSUE-37
qualify your interrupts (from public comments)
ISSUE-38
no safe haven in presentation space (from public comments)
ISSUE-39
cooperate with WAI-ARIA 'politeness' (from public comments)
ISSUE-40
Drill-down access to all security information is not 'nice,' it's required 
(by 
UAAG 1.0). (public comment)
ISSUE-41
limited guidance on presentation OK (public comment)
ISSUE-42
Re: 3.2 Non-HTTP Web interactions (public comment)
ISSUE-43
don't disable assistive technology (public comment)
ISSUE-44
beyond 'who' (some day) (pubic comment)
ISSUE-45
full legal entity identification (is a must) (pubic comment)
ISSUE-46
widely deployed baseline, yes; usage and presentation, yes
(pubic comment)
ISSUE-47
define extension interface for content-scanning tools (public comment)
ISSUE-48
platform and browser security out of scope - NOT (public comment)
ISSUE-49
trust in browser password cache needs to be better justified (pubic 
comment)
ISSUE-50
present web security is not good enough; even 'though fixing that is out 
of 
scope for this deliverable (public comment)
ISSUE-51
distinguished Chrome is not the answer (public comment)
ISSUE-52
benchmarking success -- it's out there (public comment)
ISSUE-53
augment general usability wisdom because you are operating on a fringe (as 
is 
WAI) (Public Comment)
ISSUE-54
user understanding is where it's at (pubic comment
ISSUE-55
realism is not universal, nor does ordinariness befit exceptional
communications (public comment)
ISSUE-56
habit is little help, here (public comment)
ISSUE-57
qualify your interrupts; communicate subliminally always and through the 
focus
rarely (public comment)
ISSUE-58
simplicity is in the [diverse] world of the user (public comment)
ISSUE-59
challenge and recover are essential; one presentation fits all -NOT (pubic
comment)
ISSUE-60
reinvent Help and DoIt (public comment)
ISSUE-61
Know you don't know your users (public comment)
ISSUE-62
User-adjustable step size is part of Universal Design (public comment)
ISSUE-63
consistency is good where it fits; it doesn't always fit; so undergird 
your
consistency with a model (public comment)
ISSUE-64
'where' is less universal than 'how' for drill-down (public comment)
ISSUE-65
testing throughout evolution of product (pubic comment)
 
Thank you for the time spent reviewing the WSC draft and participating in 
this effort.
 
Bill Doyle
WSC WG member