- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 11:03:30 -0500
- To: public-uri-cg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 / Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> was heard to say: | Norm, any schedule input from XML Core? I gather | there some URI issues in some of the XML specs | reaching end-game. While ideally we'd get involved | in planning last call, and I think those specs are | past that, I'd like an estimate of when their | next state transition will happen anyway. The IRI issue is the only one that comes immediately to mind. That's escalated to the TAG already as the director pressed back at the last call telcon. | Hmm... I noted an issue w.r.t. XML Query the other day... | | why the special case for % in fn:escape-uri? | Dan Connolly (Fri, Mar 14 2003) | http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/uri/2003Mar/0027.html Another one. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-query-wg/2003Mar/0301.html It doesn't seem to be threaded very well in the archives, so you may need to scan forward a bit as well. In brief: The XSL/XML Query WGs added a document-uri() function to return the URI of a document. This is distinct from the base-uri() so that one can use it to distinguish between documents in a collection that might have the same base-uri(). It was suggested that this always be an absolute URI. I pointed out that it's possible to construct a circumstance in which the absolute URI is not available (but URI experts could demonstrate that I'm wrong, which would suit me fine). The new proposal is that "" be returned if an absolute URI isn't avialable. Feh. | Ray, any events in the library community we should know | about? Any opportunities to present stuff, or opportunities | to recruit review resources or whatnot? There's the whole OASIS thing: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/xri/ Be seeing you, norm - -- Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM | Well-being is attained by little and little, XML Standards Architect | and nevertheless it is no little thing Web Tech. and Standards | itself.--Zen of Citium Sun Microsystems, Inc. | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iD8DBQE+eeZSOyltUcwYWjsRAgANAJ9RoG4XHu212R+k4+08u2J75YUxegCgl4wZ 0Yf0fGpQmZNAV+vtWc3TgcU= =i4HO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 20 March 2003 11:03:53 UTC