Re: Unhosted web apps as a use case for Linked Web Storage

pá 22. 11. 2024 v 1:20 odesílatel Nick Jennings <nick@silverbucket.net>
napsal:

>
> On 21.11.2024 22:25, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
>
>
> čt 21. 11. 2024 v 17:58 odesílatel Michiel de Jong <michiel@unhosted.org>
> napsal:
>
>>
>> Should we add unhosted web apps as a use case for linked web storage?
>>
>
> Do you have some examples of unhosted apps that are still working?
>
> Off the top of my head:
>
> * https://litewrite.net
>
> * https://sharesome.5apps.com
>
> But I know there are several more, I just can't recall them and don't know
> of an up-to-date curated list.
>
Thanks for the examples, Nick! Litewrite does bring back memories—I used it
back in the day too. It’s a shame it’s blocked by Google now, and given
that it hasn’t been updated since 2018, it feels like it’s no longer
representative of an active ecosystem.

I think it’s great to explore use cases, but I wonder if focusing on apps
or approaches that are still widely used and actively maintained might make
more sense for this group. W3C RECs tend to carry the most value when they
reflect what’s already working well in the real world. Standardizing
something with a strong existing community of users feels like the best way
forward.

Hope this makes sense!

> -Nick
>