Re: Your comments on the W3C User Agent Accessibility Guidelines working draft

Hi Folks

We saw that 3.1.1 has been removed because it is untestable.
 What aspect was found untestable? Is it identifying what content is important or the task that the user is trying to perform? Could you provide more details?
 
All the best

Lisa Seeman

Athena ICT Accessibility Projects 
LinkedIn, Twitter





---- On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 20:26:05 +0200 Jeanne Spellman<jeanne@w3.org> wrote ---- 

No problem! I'm sorry the directions were not clear. The challenge 
between writing something short and something comprehensive. :( 
 
All the responses are here: 
http://jspellman.github.io/UAAG-LC-Comment/ 
 
If you search (find) on the web page, you can search for CA01 and that 
will bring you to the row on the spreadsheet that has CA01. Our 
response is in column 4. 
 
Then you can search for CA02, CA03, etc. 
 
If that doesn't work for you, please let me know, and we can work out 
something else. 
 
jeanne 
 
On 10/5/2014 11:58 AM, lisa.seeman wrote: 
> Hi Jeanne 
> 
> I am having a bit of trouble finding the responses to our specific comments. 
> 
> 
> Could you give some more instructions? Sorry to be a pain... 
> 
> All the best 
> 
> Lisa Seeman 
> 
> Athena ICT Accessibility Projects 
> LinkedIn, Twitter 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---- On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 22:40:28 +0300 Jeanne Spellman<jeanne@w3.org> wrote ---- 
> 
> 
> Lisa and Cognitive A11Y TF, 
> 
> Thank you for your thoughtful comments on the User Agent Accessibility 
> Guidelines (UAAG) 2.0 Last Call Working Draft. The working group (UAWG) 
> has considered all comments and has published a new working draft of 
> UAAG 2.0 that integrates the input of all the comments. Many were 
> interlocking or had implications beyond the text that was the immediate 
> source of the comment. See the list of changes in the Status section for 
> an overview of changes and the link to more detailed list of changes. 
> Your original comments: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-uaag2-comments/2014Feb/0000.html 
> UAAG 2.0: http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-UAAG20-20140925/ 
> UAAG 2.0 Reference: 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-UAAG20-Reference-20140925/ 
> 
> The Disposition of Comments spreadsheet lists all of the comments and 
> the UAWG response for each one. You may find your comments by searching 
> for the comment number starting with: CA 
> http://jspellman.github.io/UAAG-LC-Comment/ 
> 
> Please respond to the publicly archived list (reply all to this email) 
> by 10 October 2014 to let us know if our response to your comment is 
> acceptable or not. You may also file Issues in Github. In case of 
> disagreement, you are requested to provide a specific solution for or a 
> path to a consensus with the Working Group. If such a consensus cannot 
> be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to raise a formal 
> objection which will then be reviewed by the Director during the 
> transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C Recommendation 
> Track. 
> email: public-uaag2-comments@w3.org 
> archive: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-uaag2-comments/ 
> Github: https://github.com/w3c/UAAG/issues 
> 
> If we have not heard from you by 10 October 2014, we will assume that 
> our response is acceptable. This Working Draft is open for new or 
> additional comments until 17 October, 2014. 
> 
> UAWG thanks you for your contribution to improving this working draft. 
> Your input has helped significantly. We hope you will continue to 
> comment on future drafts. 
> 
> Regards, 
> 
> Jim Allan, Co-Chair 
> kelly Ford, Co-Chair 
> Jeanne Spellman, W3C Staff Contact 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
 
-- 
_______________________________ 
Jeanne Spellman 
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative 
jeanne@w3.org