- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2026 22:01:26 -0500
- To: Alexander Cerutti <cerutti.alexander@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-tt@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CACQ=j+dAPjXCOC1ASNhmbnb2amMzsmLGK6jM+H472=Fx=x4r-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Note that specifying timeContainer="par" on a p (paragraph) element is redundant since that value is assigned if the attribute is not specified. On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 4:03 PM Alexander Cerutti < cerutti.alexander@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > While introducing the support to <animate>, <animation> and <set> to my > TTML engine, a new doubt came across. > > Are these elements influenced by the timeContainer attribute as well? I > gave a look at TTML document and to both SMIL and SVG specifications but > didn't find a precise answer. > > Although it may sound logical that the following two animations start at > 0s and run as parallel (as per the timeContainer), this idea clashes in > the other side of my brain, which says that defining two or more <animate> > (or <set>) like this, seem to define two animations that run sequentially. > > ```xml > <p timeContainer="par" dur="10s"> > <animate tts:color="red;blue" dur="5s" /> > <animate tts:opacity="0;0.5" dur="6s" /> > </p> > ``` > > So, if timeContainer='par' applies to the <animate>, only parallel is > possible (unless otherwise specified), but if it doesn't, is a sequential > behavior implicitly applied? > > Let's take the example at "*Example Fragment – Region Style Animation*". > > ```xml > <tt xml:lang="" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/ns/ttml" > xmlns:ttp="http://www.w3.org/ns/ttml#parameter" > xmlns:tts="http://www.w3.org/ns/ttml#styling" > ttp:extent="640px 480px"> > <head> > <layout> > <region xml:id="r1" timeContainer="seq" tts:opacity="0"> > <animate dur="1s" tts:opacity="0;1"/> > <set dur="5s" tts:opacity="1"/> > <animate dur="1s" tts:opacity="1;0"/> > <style tts:extent="480px 60px"/> > <style tts:origin="80px 400px"/> > </region> > </layout> > </head> > <body region="r1">...</body> > </tt> > ``` > > The note right after it, says: > > In the above example, a region, r1, is initially set to 0% opacity, fully > transparent, then is faded in to 100% opacity, fully opaque, over a one > second interval. Opacity remains at 100% for five more seconds, and then is > faded out to 0% over a one second interval, where it remains. > > > Does the described behavior apply because of the timeContainer='seq' applied > to the region element or is this the default behavior for all the > animations? > > Hence, when <animation> defines some <animate> and <set>, as it isn't > allowed to have a timeContainer, does this imply that the timeContainer > used is the one of the element that references the animation (through the > animate attribute)? > > Thank you, > Alexander >
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2026 03:01:42 UTC