Re: TTML2 CR Showing as Outdated

   hi Nigel, Glenn,

   Thank you for comments. (and sorry I could not attend meeting last week...)

   Per comments, we may want to ask to have both /TR/ttml2/ and the latest CR (or publication).

   Current system is quite simple, that a URL is called for data
https://www.w3.org/TR/tr-outdated-spec

which returns simple json as
{  "header":"This version is outdated!",
    "warning":"For the latest version, please look at ",
    "latestUrl":"https:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/ttml2\/"}

   One way we may ask is that adding new value to point when the latest publication
is not /TR/, and showing both link as message. Does such request work?


   best,


On 2024/08/29 20:36, Nigel Megitt wrote:
>> On 28/08/2024, 18:47, "Atsushi Shimono (W3C Team)" <atsushi@w3.org <mailto:atsushi@w3.org>> wrote:
>> On 2024/08/29 2:19, Glenn Adams wrote:
>>> Thanks for that correction. In that case, shouldn't the (outdated) earlier CR I referenced make a reference to this newer snapshot rather than referring to the 1st edition TTML2 Rec at https://www.w3.org/TR/ttml2/ <https://www.w3.org/TR/ttml2/> <https://www.w3.org/TR/ttml2/>? <https://www.w3.org/TR/ttml2/&gt;?>
>>
>>
>> we may ask for system development and update for more customizable and/or
>> rich feature of outdated banner (= might be a customization only for us), but
>> linking to simple 'latest link' (as /TR/<shortname>/) seems reasonable to me,
>> since we set the latest formal version as the latest REC, and asked to configure
>> /TR/ttml2/ as the latest REC, but not to CRS branch under development. Also we
>> consider development branch as non official one per standard specification,
>> I suppose /TR/ttml2/ could be suitable for most of user who are not in development
>> community (or ones writing/using TTML2 documents)...
>>
>>
>> Of course, someone might point that there is a system to show whole history,
>> like
>> https://www.w3.org/standards/history/ttml2/ <https://www.w3.org/standards/history/ttml2/>
>> and having history link at outdated banner could be better... Note, current
>> latest spec template contains history link in details section. (I forgot when
>> system started providing this link.)
> 
> Perhaps a useful feature that others would also use is to point to the most recent publication in the /history page
> 
> Nigel
> 
> 
>>> Screenshot 2024-08-28 at 12.16.09 PM.png
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 12:05 PM Atsushi Shimono (W3C Team) <atsushi@w3.org <mailto:atsushi@w3.org> <mailto:atsushi@w3.org <mailto:atsushi@w3.org>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2024/08/28 23:52, Glenn Adams wrote:
>>>> Wrong link. Should have been:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.w3.org/TR/2020/CR-ttml2-20200128/ <https://www.w3.org/TR/2020/CR-ttml2-20200128/> <https://www.w3.org/TR/2020/CR-ttml2-20200128/> <https://www.w3.org/TR/2020/CR-ttml2-20200128/&gt;> <https://www.w3.org/TR/2020/CR-ttml2-20200128/ <https://www.w3.org/TR/2020/CR-ttml2-20200128/> <https://www.w3.org/TR/2020/CR-ttml2-20200128/>> <https://www.w3.org/TR/2020/CR-ttml2-20200128/&gt;&gt;>
>>>
>>> Latest should be : https://www.w3.org/TR/2021/CR-ttml2-20210309/ <https://www.w3.org/TR/2021/CR-ttml2-20210309/> <https://www.w3.org/TR/2021/CR-ttml2-20210309/> <https://www.w3.org/TR/2021/CR-ttml2-20210309/&gt;>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 8:27 AM Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com <mailto:glenn@skynav.com> <mailto:glenn@skynav.com <mailto:glenn@skynav.com>> <mailto:glenn@skynav.com <mailto:glenn@skynav.com> <mailto:glenn@skynav.com <mailto:glenn@skynav.com>>>> wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> Can the outdated popup and banner be removed? I had asked about this before. This CR is still the latest AFAIK. Correct me if I'm wrong.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/REC-ttml2-20181108/ <https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/REC-ttml2-20181108/> <https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/REC-ttml2-20181108/> <https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/REC-ttml2-20181108/&gt;> <https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/REC-ttml2-20181108/ <https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/REC-ttml2-20181108/> <https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/REC-ttml2-20181108/>> <https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/REC-ttml2-20181108/&gt;&gt;>
>>>>
> 
> 

Received on Thursday, 5 September 2024 08:30:45 UTC