- From: Atsushi Shimono (W3C Team) <atsushi@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2024 01:38:14 +0900
- To: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>, "public-tt@w3.org" <public-tt@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <9ef85463-f5ce-4367-b502-293ff10cbd86@w3.org>
hi, On 2024/03/29 2:07, Nigel Megitt wrote: > Thanks all for attending today’s TTWG meeting. Minutes can be found in HTML format at https://www.w3.org/2024/03/28-tt-minutes.html <https://www.w3.org/2024/03/28-tt-minutes.html> I'm sorry that I could not attend due that I've totally got down on Thu late afternoon after I've arrived to home via 9.5h air trip... (I thought/hoped to attend, but finally could not...) > Timed Text Working Group Teleconference > > 28 March 2024 > IMSC-HRM AC Review of PR > [13]Poll results > [13] https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/202402-PR-IMSC-HRM/results <https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/202402-PR-IMSC-HRM/results> > Nigel: [summarises results] > … The poll closes today > … I think there have been some attempts to get more responses, > from various people, > … so thank you for that. > … From what I can see, it appears to be a formality to move to > Rec from this, as it stands. > … Obviously we don't have Atsushi to speak for the team. we've finally got one suggested change, but no objection, so I'd plan to submit for transition call once we have finished update following suggested points: https://github.com/w3c/imsc-hrm/issues/79 Sorry I could not participate at the call, but was there any plan forward for a PR on this non-substantive change?
Received on Saturday, 30 March 2024 16:38:20 UTC