- From: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 11:36:41 +0000
- To: "Atsushi Shimono (W3C Team)" <atsushi@w3.org>, "public-tt@w3.org" <public-tt@w3.org>
>On 28/08/2024, 18:47, "Atsushi Shimono (W3C Team)" <atsushi@w3.org <mailto:atsushi@w3.org>> wrote: >On 2024/08/29 2:19, Glenn Adams wrote: >> Thanks for that correction. In that case, shouldn't the (outdated) earlier CR I referenced make a reference to this newer snapshot rather than referring to the 1st edition TTML2 Rec at https://www.w3.org/TR/ttml2/ <https://www.w3.org/TR/ttml2/> <https://www.w3.org/TR/ttml2/>? <https://www.w3.org/TR/ttml2/>?> > > >we may ask for system development and update for more customizable and/or >rich feature of outdated banner (= might be a customization only for us), but >linking to simple 'latest link' (as /TR/<shortname>/) seems reasonable to me, >since we set the latest formal version as the latest REC, and asked to configure >/TR/ttml2/ as the latest REC, but not to CRS branch under development. Also we >consider development branch as non official one per standard specification, >I suppose /TR/ttml2/ could be suitable for most of user who are not in development >community (or ones writing/using TTML2 documents)... > > >Of course, someone might point that there is a system to show whole history, >like >https://www.w3.org/standards/history/ttml2/ <https://www.w3.org/standards/history/ttml2/> >and having history link at outdated banner could be better... Note, current >latest spec template contains history link in details section. (I forgot when >system started providing this link.) Perhaps a useful feature that others would also use is to point to the most recent publication in the /history page Nigel >> Screenshot 2024-08-28 at 12.16.09 PM.png >> >> On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 12:05 PM Atsushi Shimono (W3C Team) <atsushi@w3.org <mailto:atsushi@w3.org> <mailto:atsushi@w3.org <mailto:atsushi@w3.org>>> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 2024/08/28 23:52, Glenn Adams wrote: >> > Wrong link. Should have been: >> > >> > https://www.w3.org/TR/2020/CR-ttml2-20200128/ <https://www.w3.org/TR/2020/CR-ttml2-20200128/> <https://www.w3.org/TR/2020/CR-ttml2-20200128/> <https://www.w3.org/TR/2020/CR-ttml2-20200128/>> <https://www.w3.org/TR/2020/CR-ttml2-20200128/ <https://www.w3.org/TR/2020/CR-ttml2-20200128/> <https://www.w3.org/TR/2020/CR-ttml2-20200128/>> <https://www.w3.org/TR/2020/CR-ttml2-20200128/>>> >> >> Latest should be : https://www.w3.org/TR/2021/CR-ttml2-20210309/ <https://www.w3.org/TR/2021/CR-ttml2-20210309/> <https://www.w3.org/TR/2021/CR-ttml2-20210309/> <https://www.w3.org/TR/2021/CR-ttml2-20210309/>> >> >> >> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 8:27 AM Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com <mailto:glenn@skynav.com> <mailto:glenn@skynav.com <mailto:glenn@skynav.com>> <mailto:glenn@skynav.com <mailto:glenn@skynav.com> <mailto:glenn@skynav.com <mailto:glenn@skynav.com>>>> wrote: > >> > >> > Can the outdated popup and banner be removed? I had asked about this before. This CR is still the latest AFAIK. Correct me if I'm wrong. >> > >> > https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/REC-ttml2-20181108/ <https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/REC-ttml2-20181108/> <https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/REC-ttml2-20181108/> <https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/REC-ttml2-20181108/>> <https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/REC-ttml2-20181108/ <https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/REC-ttml2-20181108/> <https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/REC-ttml2-20181108/>> <https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/REC-ttml2-20181108/>>> >> >
Received on Thursday, 29 August 2024 11:36:50 UTC