- From: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 15:39:49 +0000
- To: W3C Public TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <0419E0D5-F963-486F-B31A-C070B657947E@bbc.co.uk>
Thanks all for attending today's TTWG meeting. Minutes can be found in HTML format at https://www.w3.org/2020/06/18-tt-minutes.html In text format: [1]W3C [1] https://www.w3.org/ Timed Text Working Group Teleconference 18 June 2020 [2]Previous meeting. [3]Agenda. [4]IRC log. [2] https://www.w3.org/2020/06/11-tt-minutes.html [3] https://github.com/w3c/ttwg/issues/122 [4] https://www.w3.org/2020/06/18-tt-irc Attendees Present Andreas, atsushi, Gary, Nigel Regrets Cyril, Pierre Chair Gary, Nigel Scribe nigel Contents 1. [5]This meeting 2. [6]Where should "headers" go relative to the `WEBVTT` magic string? webvtt#485 3. [7]IMSC 1.2 PR Published 4. [8]CSS font-matching algorithm may introduce fingerprinting issues w3c/ttml2#1202 (PING review) 5. [9]Meeting close Meeting minutes This meeting Nigel: Today we have WebVTT headers, IMSC 1.2 PR. … We also have the ARIB liaison tickets to complete our iteration over, and TTML2 2nd Ed IR, … but I note that we have no Editor of IMSC or TTML2 present. … Any other business, or points to raise? Where should "headers" go relative to the `WEBVTT` magic string? webvtt#485 github: [10]https://github.com/w3c/webvtt/issues/485 [10] https://github.com/w3c/webvtt/issues/485 Gary: We discussed this last week. We put it back on this week because Roger Pantos, … the main editor of HLS, replied saying that they should specify the header location in HLS. … I kinda agree with him except that there are some feature requests for WebVTT for the … future that might use headers. We don't want to be in a situation where there are … incompatible header specifications in different specs. At the same time, until we add … features that use headers I'm not sure that WebVTT should describe what headers are. Nigel: I agree with the concern that incompatible definitions would be a bad thing. … Since WebVTT previously defined this, I think it would make sense at least for WebVTT … to define header conceptually even if with a note saying it isn't directly used by WebVTT … yet, but may be in the future, and is available as an extension point for other uses. Gary: Yes, actually having it as an extension/feature and calling it out as that makes sense. … I hadn't thought of that as a possibility. … Then HLS could potentially still specify it but also still point to WebVTT. … We could also try going with the most minimal definition of header. … As I said last time, it was removed because someone was asking for clarification of usage, … and it was removed rather than trying to iron out the issues. We either need to iron … out the issues or pare down the definition so it doesn't really matter. Nigel: Makes sense to me. Gary: I'll take a look at that as Editor. … I'll try to reply to the HLS mailing list (I have to join it first!) SUMMARY: @gkatsev to draft pull request bringing pared-down header definition back into WebVTT. IMSC 1.2 PR Published Nigel: We published the PR on 16th June. [11]IMSC 1.2 PR [11] https://www.w3.org/TR/2020/PR-ttml-imsc1.2-20200616/ Nigel: Need to make the group aware of some late changes. … First the link to Liberation Mono fonts no longer worked so had to be changed. … Second, the URLs to EBU specs seem to be wrong. There was an email thread with … Frans from EBU who advised us. This change has not yet been made but I believe we can … make it prior to Rec publication, since it is only URLs that are changing, not the referenced … documents themselves. … That's w3c/imsc#561. … Also the BBC's AC rep, Chris Needham proposed some editorial changes to the Changes … section to clarify them. They are in w3c/imsc#560. … I am not expecting any process issue with those changes. CSS font-matching algorithm may introduce fingerprinting issues w3c/ttml2#1202 (PING review) github: [12]https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/issues/1202 [12] https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/issues/1202 Nigel: Just to note I did contact PING last week after the call and have not had a reply yet. … Aside from that I'd note that we have no proposals on the table for resolving the impasse. … The proposal from PING has objections from TTWG, and the proposal from TTWG that … has consensus seems to have an objection from PING! … I would really appreciate any other proposals if anyone can contribute them. SUMMARY: Awaiting PING response to the Chair, other proposals for resolving this issue are welcome. Meeting close Nigel: We've completed our agenda for today, so I'll adjourn until next week. Thanks everyone. [adjourns meeting] Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by [13]scribe.perl version 121 (Mon Jun 8 14:50:45 2020 UTC). [13] https://w3c.github.io/scribe2/scribedoc.html ---------------------------- http://www.bbc.co.uk This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. ---------------------
Received on Thursday, 18 June 2020 15:40:15 UTC