- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 12:44:03 -0700
- To: Cyril Concolato <cconcolato@netflix.com>
- Cc: TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACQ=j+cdojvyJXBL-x7bpVzZkXoKp3Nw+1F3cH+ncS=Z2PC1jA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 12:36 PM Cyril Concolato <cconcolato@netflix.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I had a look at the list of changes in TTML2 2nd Ed ( > https://www.w3.org/TR/2020/CR-ttml2-20200128/ttml2-changes.html). We have > 13 syntax changes and 14 semantic only changes, for a total of 27. Thanks > to Glenn's work it's fairly easy to track the associated tests. Out of > these, 14 already have tests (corresponding to 50 new files, thanks to > Glenn again). 4 are marked as 'untestable'. We are left with 9 changes that > need review. Here they are: > > Syntax Changes > * Add #presentation-audio feature designation (w3c/ttml2#1097). > * Add IMSC profile designators (w3c/ttml2#1123). > * Permit audio|image in body content model (w3c/ttml2#1125). > > Semantic (Only) Changes > * Ignore text children of ruby container spans (w3c/ttml2#1077). > * Define shear value to degree mapping (w3c/ttml2#1094). > * Clarify media type parameters (w3c/ttml2#1099). > * Define font selection strategy used by line height algorithm > (w3c/ttml2#1106). > * Remove error condition from scaling procedure (w3c/ttml2#1109). > * Correct #extent-root-version-2 designation (w3c/ttml2#1110). > > Glenn, does this match your analysis? > > We could start populating the Implementation report with the 50 rows for > the 50 test files currently available, to determine the gap in terms of > implementation support. > I presume you are counting the new entries marked "2e" in the JSON files? I need to review these to check their mapping/association with the PRs listed in the change document to verify whether (and which) - "2e" test files are misassociated with a 2e substantive PR - "2e" test files are missing, i.e., a 2e substantive PR exists but no "2e" test file is associated with it > Glenn, is there a script to generate these rows from the JSON "since: > "2e"" attribute? > no > > Nigel, I noticed that we have 4 open PR on the test repo that we should > probably review and possibly merge or discuss at the next meeting. > > HTH, > Cyril >
Received on Thursday, 6 February 2020 19:44:19 UTC