- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 18:36:01 +0800
- To: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
- Cc: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>, TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACQ=j+e=iPpLamcQa_jx6Hp5TWpDpuWtjfn3Zh72YO3EwfpNrQ@mail.gmail.com>
See [1] for PR to replace XML1.1 references with references to identical text in XML1.0 5e. [1] https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/pull/1159 On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 6:09 PM Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: > Agreed. We can handle the change in TTML1 3e by using the errata document > [1] so we aren't forced to create a 4e just for this change. > > [1] https://www.w3.org/2018/11/ttml1-3ed-errata.html > > On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 5:18 PM Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk> > wrote: > >> Thanks for highlighting this Pierre. >> >> Looking at this from a TTWG perspective and reviewing the comments, it >> seems that: >> >> 1. If XML 1.1 really is obsolete and we don’t need it because XML 1.0 >> 5th Edition does everything that anyone does, then W3C should be motivated >> to direct people away from it. >> 2. TTML1 3rd Ed and TTML2 only reference XML 1.1 for production 4a >> which is now available in the identical form in XML 1.0 5th Edition, so >> they could be modified without harm to reference XML 1.0 instead. >> 3. IMSC 1.1 references XML 1.0 and does not reference XML 1.1. >> >> From a group perspective therefore I would propose: >> >> A) we should remove the references to XML 1.1 in favour of XML 1.0 5th >> Edition, regardless. >> B) if there is a TAG determination that XML 1.1 is genuinely obsolete >> then we request coordination with the team so that they do not obsolete XML >> 1.1 before we have updated TTML as per A above. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Nigel >> >> >> >> From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> >> Date: Saturday, 7 September 2019 at 00:21 >> To: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com> >> Cc: TTWG <public-tt@w3.org> >> Subject: Re: Obsoleting XML 1.1 >> Resent-From: <public-tt@w3.org> >> Resent-Date: Saturday, 7 September 2019 at 00:22 >> >> Actually, it is normatively referenced by all TTML RECs going back to >> TTML1 1st Edition. See my comment at [1]. >> >> [1] https://github.com/w3ctag/obsoletion/issues/6#issuecomment-529043881 >> >> On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 1:57 AM Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Good morning/evening, >>> >>> See proposal to obsolete XML 1.1, which TTML 2 normatively references: >>> >>> https://github.com/w3ctag/obsoletion/issues/6 >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> -- Pierre >>> >>>
Received on Monday, 9 September 2019 10:36:36 UTC