- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 06:57:13 +0800
- To: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- Cc: W3C Public TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>
This module is in Nigel's bailiwick, so I'll let him address your questions. On 10/28/19, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote: > Nigel, Glenn, Atsushi and all, > > PlH asked me to look into the publication of Live extension module and the > carriage mechanism as FPWD > > I believe this action was discussed during the TTWG F2F meeting at TPAC on > sept 18th, where unfortunately I could not participate. > https://www.w3.org/2019/09/18-tt-minutes.html#x14 > > The resolution during this F2F meeting was "go to FPWD for the Live > extension module and the carriage mechanism after resolving current open > issues" > > Therefore I have investigated into it: > > From what I remember, this wasn't discussed further during the telecons > after TPAC, as I also see in the minutes. > https://www.w3.org/2019/10/03-tt-minutes.html > https://www.w3.org/2019/10/10-tt-minutes.html > > 1- TTML Live Extensions Module v1 FPWD > > Looking at Github https://github.com/w3c/tt-module-live/issues > I see issues open on sept 19th by Glenn for text updates. These updates > seem to be pending, and not yet incorporated in the current version dated > september 3rd, available at > https://w3c.github.io/tt-module-live/tt-live-1/spec/tt-live.html > > Glenn, my understanding is that this document is not yet ready for FPWD > publication. Is that right ? > > Nigel, as you are the editor of this draft could you please confirm that it > needs more work and could you let me know when the document is ready for > publication ? > > Meanwhile I have requested Transition, as requested to me by PlH, but maybe > it should be put on wait, until we resolve these issues. > https://github.com/w3c/transitions/issues/181 > > > 2- TTML Live Carriage over WebSocket > > Looking at Github, I see a PR from Atsushi which says : "Not yet finished > for request review..." > https://github.com/w3c/tt-module-live/pull/9 > > and on oct 24th a commit which says "[need work] 'submission' -> > 'specification'" > > https://github.com/w3c/tt-module-live/pull/9/commits/d22fed0fdb2eae20a8a9b080585ea46c41b9feb1 > > The draft is available at > https://w3c.github.io/tt-module-live/tt-live-1/spec/carriage/WebSocket/tt-live-carriage-WebSocket.html > It is a version dated september 3rd. > > The above updates like for example "specification" to replace "submission" > are not yet incorporated into this draft. > > My understanding is that this document is not yet ready for FPWD > publication. Is that right ? > > Nigel, as you are the editor of this draft could you please confirm that it > needs more updates and could you let me know when the document is ready for > publication ? > > Meanwhile I have requested Transition, as requested to me by PlH, but maybe > it should be put on wait, until we resolve these issues. > https://github.com/w3c/transitions/issues/182 > > > > 3- TTML Live Extensions Guide > > Draft dated sept 3rd is available at : > > https://w3c.github.io/tt-module-live/tt-live-1/guide/tt-live-guide.html > > I don' read in the minutes a resolution to publish this FPNote and I not > sure the document is yet finalized. > > I believe the title may be wrong and should be changed to "TTML Live > Extensions Guide 1" > similarly as per issue w3c/tt-module-live#5 > > So the draft may not be yet ready for publication. > > > Meanwhile I have requested Transition, but maybe it should be put on wait, > until we resolve these issues. > https://github.com/w3c/transitions/issues/183 > > > Also, my understanding is that the CfC has not yet started for these 3 > Drafts according to our Decision Policy > > Once the 3 above documents will be finalized, we will need to initiate a CFC > period of 10 working days before FPWD according to our decision policy. > Then the 3 Transition Requests currently on HOLD could be validated. > > Let me know ASAP, so I can proceed accordingly > > Do we want to synchronize the publication of these 3 drafts on the same day > ? > > Could the status of these drafts for FPWG be added to the next telecon > agenda ? > > Thanks, > > > Thierry > > >
Received on Monday, 28 October 2019 22:57:18 UTC