- From: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 15:54:32 +0000
- To: Timed Text Working Group <public-tt@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <D903461C.43C44%nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
Thanks to all who attended today’s TTWG meeting. Minutes can be found in HTML format at https://www.w3.org/2019/05/16-tt-minutes.html There was a problem starting the meeting (slow connectivity from me to Webex) and attendance was low so the discussion was limited to a status update on the Charter. The minutes in text format: [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ Timed Text Working Group Teleconference 16 May 2019 [2]Agenda [2] https://github.com/w3c/ttwg/issues/38 See also: [3]IRC log [3] https://www.w3.org/2019/05/16-tt-irc Attendees Present Philippe, Andreas, Glenn, Nigel Regrets Thierry, Pierre, Cyril, Gary Chair Nigel Scribe nigel Contents * [4]Topics 1. [5]This meeting 2. [6]Charter renewal 3. [7]Meeting close * [8]Summary of Action Items * [9]Summary of Resolutions __________________________________________________________ <scribe> scribe: nigel This meeting Glenn: I'd like to talk about the schedule for the Charter, and I have to leave at the half hour. ... I don't think we can have any technical discussions today given the lack of participants. Philippe: I can update on the Charter. Nigel: I was hoping to discuss ttml2#1054. Glenn: Fragment ID URLs? Nigel: yes Glenn: I have some work in progress to complete before I can take that any further. Nigel: Given the attendees it seems like we should discuss Charter. ... We can't cover WebVTT without Gary. Any AOB? group: no AOB Charter renewal Nigel: I suggest a status update from Philippe first. Philippe: [work in progress] ... not gone to W3M yet. Has been circulated for horizontal cross-review. ... There is a small tweak to make, nothing major. Glenn: I've raised my concern previously about the dates for TTML2 2nd Ed and TTML3. I think its impossible ... to resolve 50 issues on TTML2 between now and June 1 when we're expecting FPWD. ... My suggestion is to push out those dates by 1 year compared to the current Charter draft. ... The current dates are not going to happen. ... Unless we defer some issues to 3rd Ed. Nigel: I would like to separate TTML3 from TTML2 for this, and I think there's less of a drive for TTML3. ... I would like to do what we said we'd do before and set a timetable for TTML2 2nd Ed and resolve the issues we can ... within that timescale and defer the remainder. Glenn: I agree about separating the timelines for TTML2 2nd Ed and TTML3. ... But I still think we should delay 2nd Ed. It is feasible to meet an April 1 Rec date but no way by the end of the year. Nigel: I would say March 31 is the absolute latest. <plh> [10]https://w3c.github.io/charter-timed-text/ [10] https://w3c.github.io/charter-timed-text/ Philippe: I don't see any timeline in the proposed Charter. Am I missing something? Nigel: I agree, there's a link to the group publication status page. Philippe: Which is great. Glenn: We can update that without changing the Charter, right? Philippe: Correct. It would be good to have realistic timelines. Glenn: I'm all for having no dates in the Charter. Philippe: At some point we might want to switch to Evergreen, the proposal to do Living Standards at W3C. ... It's only a proposal, not part of the process. Nigel: Glenn, it seems like your concerns are addressed? Glenn: Right, I have no problems with the draft Charter as it is. Philippe: The publication page has no milestones in it yet either. ... I hope to get it to W3M by end of May. I would like to wrap up on WebVTT too, so if we can move it to PR ... then my story would be better. I would hate to revise the Charter without WebVTT moving to PR. That needs Gary ... to have that conversation. Nigel: At this stage I don't think we have enough input materials in terms of the implementation report to make a ... decision about moving to PR. Philippe: I suggest you mention what you need from Gary to move ahead. Nigel: Yes. Philippe: I want to do the minimum to declare victory here and make WebVTT a Rec and move on because whether ... we like it or not it is part of the web, and not making it a Recommendation will not make it go away. Nigel: OK, as long as we're within the requirements of the Process. I just haven't seen the documentation that says ... all the non-at-risk features are implemented. When we have that I'm sure we can move ahead. Meeting close Nigel: Given the attendance, and that Glenn has to drop off the call now, and that we have no more agenda topics ... to cover, let's adjourn a little earlier than planned today. Thanks everyone, apologies again for the late start from me. ... [adjourns meeting] Summary of Action Items Summary of Resolutions [End of minutes] __________________________________________________________ Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by David Booth's [11]scribe.perl version 1.154 ([12]CVS log) $Date: 2019/05/16 15:51:16 $ [11] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm [12] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Thursday, 16 May 2019 15:54:56 UTC