- From: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 15:54:32 +0000
- To: Timed Text Working Group <public-tt@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <D903461C.43C44%nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
Thanks to all who attended today’s TTWG meeting. Minutes can be found in HTML format at https://www.w3.org/2019/05/16-tt-minutes.html
There was a problem starting the meeting (slow connectivity from me to Webex) and attendance was low so the discussion was limited to a status update on the Charter.
The minutes in text format:
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
Timed Text Working Group Teleconference
16 May 2019
[2]Agenda
[2] https://github.com/w3c/ttwg/issues/38
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] https://www.w3.org/2019/05/16-tt-irc
Attendees
Present
Philippe, Andreas, Glenn, Nigel
Regrets
Thierry, Pierre, Cyril, Gary
Chair
Nigel
Scribe
nigel
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]This meeting
2. [6]Charter renewal
3. [7]Meeting close
* [8]Summary of Action Items
* [9]Summary of Resolutions
__________________________________________________________
<scribe> scribe: nigel
This meeting
Glenn: I'd like to talk about the schedule for the Charter, and
I have to leave at the half hour.
... I don't think we can have any technical discussions today
given the lack of participants.
Philippe: I can update on the Charter.
Nigel: I was hoping to discuss ttml2#1054.
Glenn: Fragment ID URLs?
Nigel: yes
Glenn: I have some work in progress to complete before I can
take that any further.
Nigel: Given the attendees it seems like we should discuss
Charter.
... We can't cover WebVTT without Gary. Any AOB?
group: no AOB
Charter renewal
Nigel: I suggest a status update from Philippe first.
Philippe: [work in progress]
... not gone to W3M yet. Has been circulated for horizontal
cross-review.
... There is a small tweak to make, nothing major.
Glenn: I've raised my concern previously about the dates for
TTML2 2nd Ed and TTML3. I think its impossible
... to resolve 50 issues on TTML2 between now and June 1 when
we're expecting FPWD.
... My suggestion is to push out those dates by 1 year compared
to the current Charter draft.
... The current dates are not going to happen.
... Unless we defer some issues to 3rd Ed.
Nigel: I would like to separate TTML3 from TTML2 for this, and
I think there's less of a drive for TTML3.
... I would like to do what we said we'd do before and set a
timetable for TTML2 2nd Ed and resolve the issues we can
... within that timescale and defer the remainder.
Glenn: I agree about separating the timelines for TTML2 2nd Ed
and TTML3.
... But I still think we should delay 2nd Ed. It is feasible to
meet an April 1 Rec date but no way by the end of the year.
Nigel: I would say March 31 is the absolute latest.
<plh> [10]https://w3c.github.io/charter-timed-text/
[10] https://w3c.github.io/charter-timed-text/
Philippe: I don't see any timeline in the proposed Charter. Am
I missing something?
Nigel: I agree, there's a link to the group publication status
page.
Philippe: Which is great.
Glenn: We can update that without changing the Charter, right?
Philippe: Correct. It would be good to have realistic
timelines.
Glenn: I'm all for having no dates in the Charter.
Philippe: At some point we might want to switch to Evergreen,
the proposal to do Living Standards at W3C.
... It's only a proposal, not part of the process.
Nigel: Glenn, it seems like your concerns are addressed?
Glenn: Right, I have no problems with the draft Charter as it
is.
Philippe: The publication page has no milestones in it yet
either.
... I hope to get it to W3M by end of May. I would like to wrap
up on WebVTT too, so if we can move it to PR
... then my story would be better. I would hate to revise the
Charter without WebVTT moving to PR. That needs Gary
... to have that conversation.
Nigel: At this stage I don't think we have enough input
materials in terms of the implementation report to make a
... decision about moving to PR.
Philippe: I suggest you mention what you need from Gary to move
ahead.
Nigel: Yes.
Philippe: I want to do the minimum to declare victory here and
make WebVTT a Rec and move on because whether
... we like it or not it is part of the web, and not making it
a Recommendation will not make it go away.
Nigel: OK, as long as we're within the requirements of the
Process. I just haven't seen the documentation that says
... all the non-at-risk features are implemented. When we have
that I'm sure we can move ahead.
Meeting close
Nigel: Given the attendance, and that Glenn has to drop off the
call now, and that we have no more agenda topics
... to cover, let's adjourn a little earlier than planned
today. Thanks everyone, apologies again for the late start from
me.
... [adjourns meeting]
Summary of Action Items
Summary of Resolutions
[End of minutes]
__________________________________________________________
Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
David Booth's [11]scribe.perl version 1.154 ([12]CVS log)
$Date: 2019/05/16 15:51:16 $
[11] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
[12] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Thursday, 16 May 2019 15:54:56 UTC