- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 07:57:51 -0700
- To: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
- Cc: TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACQ=j+fqyVNh9xMhFb4cc=36KOSRMcj5TESNKbgpOCtuAUcEBQ@mail.gmail.com>
s/can think/can't think/ On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 7:51 AM Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: > Correct. That is my assumption. But I'm willing to consider use cases for > allowing it. I just can think of a good one. If you are going to provide a > font resource you can give it any family name, so what is the need to > override a generic family name? > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 7:31 AM Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Glenn, >> >> Your conclusion is that tts:fontFamily="proportionalSerif" is always >> implementation-dependent and cannot be overridden by the author? >> >> Best, >> >> -- Pierre >> >> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 2:27 PM Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: >> >>> I have (since around October) had the following note on my TODO list for >>> filing issues against TTML2: >>> >>> + [SUBSTANTIVE] do not allow @family on font element to be >>> >>> a <generic-family-name> (either unquoted or quoted); >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 2:08 AM Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Good morning/evening, >>>> >>>> Say the following is present in a TTML2 document: >>>> >>>> <resources> >>>> <font family="default" range="u+20-7f,u+90-9f"> >>>> <source src="http://example.com/fonts/default.otf" >>>> type="font/otf"/> >>>> </font> >>>> </resources> >>>> >>>> In the following snippet, is a presentation processor expected to use >>>> the embedded font, or is the font selection sill left to the implementation? >>>> >>>> <p tts:fontFamily="default">font above or application-selected?</p> >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> -- Pierre >>>> >>>
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2019 14:58:26 UTC