- From: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 16:57:34 +0000
- To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- CC: W3C Public TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>, Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
Comments inline: On 28/03/2018, 17:50, "singer@apple.com on behalf of David Singer" <singer@apple.com> wrote: >Some minor corrections from a colleague: > >1) "captions for deaf and hard of hear² should be "captions for the deaf >and hard of hearing² (insert ³the² and ³ing²) +1 > >2) Not clear why this is a VTT-specific requirement: > > Include all features that have at least two independent and >interoperable implementations. I think that was inserted into the previous Charter and copied across. I do not know why it was added, maybe to facilitate transition? > >3) Is it ³TTML1² or ³TTML 1²? is it consistent with ³IMSC1²? We have used different styles for TTML and IMSC when it comes to appending the numbering. I'm not really bothered about this, happy to make it consistent or retain the inconsistency between them in favour of consistency with prior usage. > >4) TTML is defined as > >"This specification defines a content type that represents timed text >media for the purpose of interchange among authoring systems." > >however, it now is the basis for IMSC, which is delivery. The scope >should be expanded. Good catch. It also needs to be edited in the TTML2 Abstract, which says the same thing. It should probably be "This specification defines a content type that represents timed text media for the purpose of interchange among authoring, distribution and playback systems." > >5) IMSC1.1 is documented here as based on TTML1, but isnıt it based on >TTML2? Yes, IMSC 1.1 is based on TTML2 with extensions from IMSC 1.0.1, whereas IMSC 1.0.1 is based on TTML1. > >6) ³Entertainement² -> ³Entertainment² +1 Nigel > > > >> On Mar 27, 2018, at 8:43 , Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk> wrote: >> >> One further thought: presumably if our current Charter is extended, >>that would give some more time to publish WebVTT CR. >> >> Nigel >> >> >> From: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk> >> Date: Tuesday, 27 March 2018 at 11:12 >> To: W3C Public TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>, Thierry Michel >><tmichel@w3.org>, "David (Standards) Singer" <singer@apple.com> >> Subject: Re: edited TTWG draft charter, VTT? >> Resent-From: <public-tt@w3.org> >> Resent-Date: Tuesday, 27 March 2018 at 11:12 >> >>> As I understand it Thierry needs to send the updated Charter to W3 >>>Management today. I propose that he sends it in the current form as >>>visible at: >>> >>> https://w3c.github.io/charter-timed-text/Draft-2018-TTWG-Charter.html >>> >>> This currently includes WebVTT. Alongside this I suggest that Thierry >>>highlights the open issues on the Charter at: >>> >>> https://github.com/w3c/charter-timed-text/issues >>> >>> And the email thread beginning at >>>https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tt/2018Mar/0094.html >>> >>> If the transition of WebVTT to CR happens within the current Charter >>>period, then the Lisbon resolution will not apply. In any case W3M >>>should be aware of the challenges the WG has had and may wish to take >>>actions. >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> >>> Nigel >>> > >David Singer >Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc. >
Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2018 16:58:11 UTC