- From: David Ronca <dronca@netflix.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 10:30:55 -0700
- To: David Singer <singer@mac.com>
- Cc: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>, W3C Public TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
- Message-ID: <CAMjV-FgZAga2UmHHdarvfkddYt_jg8Kwo-2nbzbudanvEwyNxw@mail.gmail.com>
> Guys, if we want VTT to go to Rec. we need more teamwork Netflix feels that the IMSC1.1 profile of TTML2 is the best options for global subtitles both as a master format, and for distribution to devices. This has been a collaborative project that has required significant investment from many participants over several years. We do not see where WebVTT adds any additional value, and thus are not inclined to make any investment in the effort. I believe that is best left to the strong WebVTT proponents to drive. On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 9:46 AM, David Singer <singer@mac.com> wrote: > Should we bother pushing VTT to CR and then try to get to Rec.? Silvia and > I feel fairly lonely on VTT these days. We have a quality spec., but most > clients don’t implement regions, and I susoect it’ll take a while for all > the detailed spec. work we have done to get reflected in implementations. > The test suite is web-platform based, which means non-browser clients can’t > easily use it and prove that they implement features correctly. > > Which is a pile of work. And yet VTT quietly works across a broad swatch > of services and clients. > > I’ve been trying to get off the VTT chairmanship now for several years. > Silvia does the editing as a volunteer, it’s not part of her current work > duties. > > Guys, if we want VTT to go to Rec. we need more teamwork… > > > > On Mar 26, 2018, at 8:39 , David Ronca <dronca@netflix.com> wrote: > > > > What is the debate? > > > > David > > > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 10:21 AM, David Singer <singer@mac.com> wrote: > > I’m in debate with Silvia over the progression of VTT. Do others have > opinions? > > > > With WhatWG on a firmer footing, much of the original motivation to do a > Rec. has evaporated, and at this point looks like a lot of busy work to > little reward. Are there people who see it differently? > > > > > On Mar 23, 2018, at 3:16 , Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have edited the TTWG draft charter with the changes agreed during > our TTWG telecon. > > > Please review the draft charter > > > > > > https://w3c.github.io/charter-timed-text/Draft-2018-TTWG-Charter.html > > > > > > Deadline is Monday midnight US coast. I will send the charter on > tuesday to W3M for approval, and will request a charter extension. > > > > > > Thierry > > > > > > > David Singer > > > > singer@mac.com > > > > > > > > David Singer > > singer@mac.com > >
Received on Monday, 26 March 2018 17:31:22 UTC