W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tt@w3.org > January 2018

Re: Blocks CR Label

From: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 10:30:30 +0000
To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>, TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D694A795.53842%nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
As per my email of 25th Jan:

> Please could any members who would object to transitioning to CR based on issues not being resolved add this label to the relevant issues. If possible also prepare a pull request in the next week against the issue.

We are indeed obligated to resolve WR issues, however if a member believes that an unresolved issue would prevent them from agreeing to transition to CR, then we would not have consensus unless that issue were resolved. Therefore individual members can apply the label, rather than the WG needing consensus on applying the label.

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com<mailto:glenn@skynav.com>>
Date: Sunday, 28 January 2018 at 21:53
To: TTWG <public-tt@w3.org<mailto:public-tt@w3.org>>
Subject: Blocks CR Label
Resent-From: <public-tt@w3.org<mailto:public-tt@w3.org>>
Resent-Date: Sunday, 28 January 2018 at 21:54

What is your criteria for applying a "blocks CR" label on TTML2 repo? I would think that we are only obligated to resolve WR issues, and that any other issue is at the discretion of the WG (meaning we need consensus to apply this label)?



This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to this.

Received on Monday, 29 January 2018 10:31:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:44:30 UTC