- From: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 10:48:02 -0800
- To: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
- Cc: Timed Text Working Group <public-tt@w3.org>
Hi Nigel, > 13 are i18n comments. Can you confirm that these will need to be closed (and not merely deferred to a future CR) as a matter of process before CR? Best, -- Pierre On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk> wrote: > All, > > We agreed to move to CR of TTML2 by the end of January. I think we have > general acceptance that a 2 week slip at this stage would be acceptable, > i.e. the proposal to transition would be discussed in the TTWG call on 15th > February. However, in order to complete work on the open issues, they all > would need a pull request to be opened by 1st February at the latest so that > they can be closed within our normal 2 week period, assuming there are no > outstanding objections to closing them. > > Looking at the ttml2 issues list, and filtering out all those with open or > merged pull requests, and all editorial issues, there are 44 open issues. > Of those, 6 are discussed and agreed. 13 are i18n comments. So 25 issues > have been opened by group members and have no agreed resolution at this > stage, and 31 have no open pull request yet. > > We are very soon going to have to decide to defer some issues to a future > version or slip even further back. Group members have expressed strong views > against further slippage in the past and I have no reason to believe the > situation has changed. I am treating 15th February as the hard deadline, at > which point all required pull requests must have been merged. > > This means that the Editors need to know as soon as possible if there are > any issues that need particular prioritisation for creating pull requests. > > It also means that if any member is intending to raise a formal objection to > transitioning to CR based on any particular issues not being resolved, then > it would be fair to > > a) inform the group of those issues as soon as possible and > b) lend a hand preparing pull requests that would resolve them. > > I have added a "blocks CR" label to the TTML2 repository. Please could any > members who would object to transitioning to CR based on issues not being > resolved add this label to the relevant issues. If possible also prepare a > pull request in the next week against the issue. > > Kind regards, > > Nigel > > >
Received on Thursday, 25 January 2018 18:49:07 UTC