Re: F2f agenda

Hi Silvia,

Thanks. Can you provide, in preparation for the meeting, documentation
showing that all requirements for advancement [1] have been satisfied?

[1] https://www.w3.org/2017/Process-20170301/#candidate-rec

Things that come to mind include:

- formal objections
- record of disposition of wide-review comments
- documentation of substantive changes
- how adequate implementation experience will be demonstrated
- list of organizations that should be informed of the transition

Since WebVTT is not regularly discussed during TTWG telecons, I am
trying to prevent surprises during the meeting -- we have already very
little time to cover TTML1, TTML2 and IMSC1.1.

Thanks,

-- Pierre

On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 8:07 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
<silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote:
> FAIK we just need TTWG approval to make that transition.
>
> Cheers,
> Silvia.
>
> On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 6:53 PM, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com> wrote:
>>> VTT CR transition
>>
>> What is the specific action(s) requested of TTWG and its members?
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> -- Pierre
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk> wrote:
>>> For those not watching the wiki page
>>> https://www.w3.org/wiki/TimedText/jan2018f2f there’s a new agenda topic
>>> recently added by David Singer, covering VTT transition to CR.
>>>
>>>
>>> Nigel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------
>>>
>>> http://www.bbc.co.uk
>>> This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal
>>> views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
>>> If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
>>> Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance
>>> on it and notify the sender immediately.
>>> Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
>>> Further communication will signify your consent to this.
>>>
>>> ---------------------
>>

Received on Friday, 5 January 2018 04:24:47 UTC