Re: closed: Call for Consensus to publish WebVTT as a Candidate Recommendation

I approved the pull; I think it’s clear that you wanted this change and we should therefore do the formal transition request with it in place. No-one opposed your change in the end.

Silvia and Thierry will need to make sure we have the CR document in spiffy shape for the formal request to the Director, yes.

> On Apr 17, 2018, at 10:47 , Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi David,
> 
>> There was lively discussion of a number of topics — getting IPR grants for contributions from non-WG members, which process document to link to, the document license, and so on — but no-one objected.
> 
> Have the changes suggested to the SotD been accepted?
> 
> Best,
> 
> -- Pierre
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 8:04 AM, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote:
>> Hi All
>> 
>> we issued the call for consensus on March 30th
>> 
>> (twice, due to an HTML formatting issue)
>> <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tt/2018Mar/0163.html>
>> <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tt/2018Mar/0166.html>
>> 
>> There was lively discussion of a number of topics — getting IPR grants for contributions from non-WG members, which process document to link to, the document license, and so on — but no-one objected. The required 10 days have passed and therefore the call passes.
>> 
>> I think that therefore we need to ask the team to consider the CR transition.
>> 
>> 
>>> On Mar 30, 2018, at 9:16 , David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> [sending again as plain text in case the HTML format was hiding a spurious link]
>>> 
>>> All,
>>> 
>>> following this week's call giving conceptual approval pending the preparation of the CR document, and the preparation by Thierry and Silvia of the CR draft at <https://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/silviapfeiffer/webvtt-spec/blob/f8da4f27205ed2c11b7dedbf46d91b363eaafe9b/archives/2018-04-15/Overview.html> is now ready for us to request transition to Candidate Recommendation: I think that the obvious typo in “Diff from previous” has been or will imminently be fixed. This email is a call for consensus to make the transition based on this version of the document; barring any objections within the WG's Decision Policy period of 10 working days as defined in the Charter, I will ask for this transition request to be made.
>>> 
>>> (Thierry/Silvia, if there is a better link, let us know)
>>> 
>>> For transition request purposes, assuming no objections, I will record this as a resolution in the minutes of the next call.
>>> 
>>> Please review the document and if possible confirm that you agree with this resolution; silence will be taken as acceptance, but an explicit approval would be much appreciated.
>>> 
>>> If you spot any problems please raise issues as normal on the GitHub repository. We can make minor editorial fixes such as typo fixes any time.
>>> 
>>> Thanks to everyone who contributed to the push to get to this state over the last few months: this represents a lot of hard work.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> kind regards,
>>> 
>>> David
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> David Singer
>> Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
>> 
>> 

David Singer
Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.

Received on Tuesday, 17 April 2018 18:33:01 UTC