[imsc] Extensions should be easier to identify

• From: Cyril Concolato via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
• Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 22:20:31 +0000
• To: public-tt@w3.org
• Message-ID: <issues.opened-264395623-1507674016-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

cconcolato has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/imsc:

== Extensions should be easier to identify ==
In general, it is hard to identify the differences between IMSC1 and IMSCvNext.

Section F defining extension fragment identifiers is a copy of the one in IMSC1. It should either indicate that:
- the extensions designators of IMSC1 are used (full URL) 
- it defines the same identifiers but with the IMSCvNext base URL 
- it reuses the designators defined in TTML2
- or the section should be removed

Similarly, the first 4 subsections of Section 7 are copy/paste of IMSC1.0.1. I understand the need to have a self-contained document (although that's not the case regarding TTML2). I would suggest adding a sentence in each subsection indicating whether the text for each extension is identical to the one in IMSC1 or not.


Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/imsc/issues/260 using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 10 October 2017 22:20:21 UTC