On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com> wrote: > Hi David and David et al., > > My experience with implementing imscJS [1] has been that the mapping > from IMSC1 to CSS was mostly straightforward and accurate, with the > exception of two features that are not available natively in CSS but > were deemed critical to captions: linePadding and multiRowAlign. > > [1] https://github.com/sandflow/imscJS > > In my mind, IMSCvNEXT should follow a similar pattern: mapping to > HTML/CSS should be straightforward and accurate, with the exception of > features that are essential to current subtitling/captioning > practices, but not yet available in CSS. For such features, a fallback > should be specified, and UA vendors should be encourages to support > the feature in the future. > 100% agreement. > > Best, > > -- Pierre >
Received on Sunday, 1 October 2017 22:35:03 UTC