- From: Andreas Tai <tai@irt.de>
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 19:56:49 +0100
- To: "'David Singer'" <singer@mac.com>
- Cc: "'David Ronca'" <dronca@netflix.com>, "'Pierre-Anthony Lemieux'" <pal@sandflow.com>, "'Glenn Adams'" <glenn@skynav.com>, "'Nigel Megitt'" <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>, "'TTWG'" <public-tt@w3.org>
> I think there is at least a courtesy problem, if not a formal one, if the “other > namespace” and its defining document are not W3C ones, which appears to > be the case here (I assume ebutts: is EBU Timed Text). Have we not already > had this issue with SMPTE extensions? Good point! Thanks, David! I agree that even if the vocabulary is moved without the namespace, the responsible organization (in this case EBU), should be asked. Best regards, Andreas
Received on Tuesday, 28 November 2017 19:00:01 UTC