Thursday, 30 November 2017
- Re: Objections to Netflix Proposal from 2017-11-15
- [ttml1] Pull Request: Fixed EOLs to LF under /spec
- [ttml1] Some repo files have CRLF EOLs
- AW: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Objections to Netflix Proposal from 2017-11-15
- [ttml1] Pull Request: Travis CO deployment
- Re: Objections to Netflix Proposal from 2017-11-15
- Re: Agenda items re: blocking TTML1 and IMSC issues
- [ACTION 510] Use of TTML Version in Timed Text Toolkit (TTT)
- [ttml1] Pull Request: Clarified application of tts:visibility to child elements
Wednesday, 29 November 2017
- Agenda items re: blocking TTML1 and IMSC issues
- RE: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Closed: [ttml2] SMPTE backgroundImage annotation
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
Tuesday, 28 November 2017
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- AW: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- AW: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- {agenda} TTWG Meeting 2017-11-30
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Closed: [ttml2] Computed active time of <p> with multiple <span> children in relation to showBackground="whenActive"
- [ttml2] Computed active time of <p> with multiple <span> children in relation to showBackground="whenActive"
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- AW: AW: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- AW: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Re: AW: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
Monday, 27 November 2017
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- AW: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
Friday, 24 November 2017
- Re: Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- [ttml1] Pull Request: Clarified cell metrics semantics for tts:textOutline
Thursday, 23 November 2017
- [ttml1] Pull Request: Clarified tts:textDecoration inheritance
- Re: Adding TTML1 auto-build functionality
- [ttml1] State that no epoch or epochOffset is defined
- Adding TTML1 auto-build functionality
- [ttml1] Update stylesheet
- [ttml1] Pull Request: Clarify semantics in absence of begin attribute
Wednesday, 22 November 2017
- [ttml1] Pull Request: Travis CI integration
- Re: WebVTT issues to review
- Re: WebVTT issues to review
- Closed: [imsc] Should ittp:progressivelyDecodable be deprecated?
Tuesday, 21 November 2017
- [imsc] Improve itts:forcedDisplay description
- No call this week - next on 30th November
- Re: Our next face to face meeting
- [ttml1] Pull Request: Added Travis CI
Monday, 20 November 2017
- Re: Our next face to face meeting
- Our next face to face meeting
- Minutes from F2F at TPAC, Burlingame, 9-10 November 2017
- [ttml2] Does showBackground="always" apply outside a region's begin and end times?
- AW: Meeting next week?
Sunday, 19 November 2017
- [ttml1] Pull Request: Clarify that the computed value of tts:lineHeight='normal' is 'normal'
- Re: VTT edge margins: we need to know current practice. PLEASE RESPOND If you implement a VTT UA (even in a polyfill)
Saturday, 18 November 2017
Friday, 17 November 2017
- [ttml2] Pull Request: Fix gamma to 2.0
- [ttml2] Change to Appendix Q.2
- Meeting next week?
- Re: 20171116 Meeting notes
Thursday, 16 November 2017
- Re: VTT edge margins: we need to know current practice. PLEASE RESPOND If you implement a VTT UA (even in a polyfill)
- Re: VTT edge margins: we need to know current practice. PLEASE RESPOND If you implement a VTT UA (even in a polyfill)
- Re: VTT edge margins: we need to know current practice. PLEASE RESPOND If you implement a VTT UA (even in a polyfill)
- Re: VTT edge margins: we need to know current practice. PLEASE RESPOND If you implement a VTT UA (even in a polyfill)
- 20171116 Meeting notes
- ACTION-510: study TTT codebase and report on use of ttp:version to select processor behavior
- RE: VTT edge margins: we need to know current practice. PLEASE RESPOND If you implement a VTT UA (even in a polyfill)
- Re: VTT edge margins: we need to know current practice. PLEASE RESPOND If you implement a VTT UA (even in a polyfill)
- Re: Meeting reminder and agenda (7-8 AM PST on 16 NOV)
- Meeting reminder and agenda (7-8 AM PST on 16 NOV)
- [ttml2] Claims section does not take into account ttp:contentProfiles and ttp:processorProfiles
- CSS issues
Wednesday, 15 November 2017
- Re: [w3c/ttml2] Added note specifying the mapping of tt:image to smpte:backgroundImage (#492)
- Objections to TPAC resolutions on IMSC1.1
- [ttml2] Defer ruby overflow and ruby overhang to TTML3
- RE: [w3c/ttml2] Added note specifying the mapping of tt:image to smpte:backgroundImage (#492)
- Re: meeting this week
- Closed: [imsc] Is #writingMode-horizontal too general in image profile?
- [ttml2] Pull Request: Added note specifying the mapping of tt:image to smpte:backgroundImage
Tuesday, 14 November 2017
- [ttml1] Pull Request: Clarified TAB character presentation semantics
- [ttml1] Pull Request: Tweak examples of Section O
- [ttml1] Pull Request: Clarify #backgroundColor re: block, inline and region semantics
- Re: meeting this week
- Re: meeting this week
- Closed: [imsc] Unable to normatively determine non-conformance when testing content constraints.
- Closed: [imsc] Optionality of ttp:profile is overly lax in the case of image profile use.
- Closed: [imsc] IMSC should reflect revised TTML 2 profile mechanism
- Re: meeting this week
- RE: VTT edge margins: we need to know current practice. PLEASE RESPOND If you implement a VTT UA (even in a polyfill)
- Re: VTT edge margins: we need to know current practice. PLEASE RESPOND If you implement a VTT UA (even in a polyfill)
- On using pull requests (Re: Protected Policy on Repository Merging Process)
- RE: VTT edge margins: we need to know current practice. PLEASE RESPOND If you implement a VTT UA (even in a polyfill)
- Re: Two-stage process for ttml2.html
- Re: Two-stage process for ttml2.html
- Re: Protected Policy on Repository Merging Process
- Re: Two-stage process for ttml2.html
- meeting this week
- RE: Protected Policy on Repository Merging Process
- RE: Protected Policy on Repository Merging Process
- RE: Two-stage process for ttml2.html
- Re: Two-stage process for ttml2.html
- Re: Two-stage process for ttml2.html
- Re: Two-stage process for ttml2.html
- Re: Two-stage process for ttml2.html
- Two-stage process for ttml2.html
- Re: Protected Policy on Repository Merging Process
- Re: Protected Policy on Repository Merging Process
- AW: Protected Policy on Repository Merging Process
Monday, 13 November 2017
- Re: Protected Policy on Repository Merging Process
- Re: Protected Policy on Repository Merging Process
- VTT edge margins: we need to know current practice. PLEASE RESPOND If you implement a VTT UA (even in a polyfill)
- Re: Protected Policy on Repository Merging Process
- TTML2 Latest Editor's Draft
Saturday, 11 November 2017
- Re: Protected Policy on Repository Merging Process
- Re: Protected Policy on Repository Merging Process
- Re: Protected Policy on Repository Merging Process
- Re: Protected Policy on Repository Merging Process
- Re: Protected Policy on Repository Merging Process
- Re: ttp:version is not required for processor capability signaling
- WebVTT issues to review
- Closed: [ttml2] <ttm:item name='altText'> should be <ttm:altText> or <ittm:altText>
- Closed: [ttml2] ittp:aspectRatio should be added to TTML2
- Closed: [ttml2] Add ebutts:linePadding vocabulary to TTML2
- ttp:version is not required for processor capability signaling
Friday, 10 November 2017
- Closed: [imsc] Should ebutts:multiRowAlign be deprecated?
- Closed: [imsc] Should itts:fillLineGap be deprecated?
- Closed: [imsc] Should ittp:activeArea be deprecated?
- Closed: [imsc] ttp:displayAspectRatio is prohibited
- Protected Policy on Repository Merging Process
- Closed: [imsc] Should ebutts:linePadding be deprecated?
- Closed: [imsc] Should itts:forcedDisplay be deprecated?
- Tool planning for specification milestones.
- [ttml2] Add #metadata-version-2 feature designator
- [ttml2] Add ``ttm:alt`` metadata attribute item.
Thursday, 9 November 2017
- [imsc] Pull Request: Clarify that tts:fillLineGap does not hide characters
- [ttml2] rubyAlign "otherwise" clauses apply too broadly
- [imsc] add WR labels to this repo and apply to #253
- [ttml2] Pull Request: Coalesce references to URI syntax into a new <uri> value expression (…
- Closed: [ttml2] Typo in backgroundClip
- Closed: [ttml2] Allow detection of the EBU-TT-D content profile.
- [imsc] Pull Request: Deprecate #progressivelyDecodable
Wednesday, 8 November 2017
Tuesday, 7 November 2017
- Re: [ttml2] All ISDs must end, but not all TTML documents must end
- [ttml2] All ISDs must end, but not all TTML documents must end
- [ttml2] Add parameters to define the temporal extent
- Closed: [ttml2] condition="parameter(forced)==true" does not match the behavior of itts:forcedDisplay
Monday, 6 November 2017
- [imsc] privacy and cross-origin policies not clear
- [imsc] Should itts:forcedDisplay be deprecated?
- [ttml2] condition="forced" does not match the behavior of itts:forcedDisplay
- Re: Turning TTML2 into Hobo Stew
- Re: Turning TTML2 into Hobo Stew
- Re: Turning TTML2 into Hobo Stew
- Re: Turning TTML2 into Hobo Stew
- Re: Turning TTML2 into Hobo Stew
- Re: TTML2 and Japanese features
- Turning TTML2 into Hobo Stew
- [ttml2] rubyPosition="auto" should mean "outside"?
- [imsc] Should ebutts:linePadding be deprecated?
- [ttml2] Add ebutts:linePadding vocabulary to TTML2
- [imsc] Should ebutts:multiRowAlign be deprecated?
- [imsc] Should itts:fillLineGap be deprecated?
- [imsc] Should ittp:activeArea be deprecated?
- [imsc] Should ittm:altText be deprecated?
- [ttml2] <ttm:item name='altText'> should be <ttm:altText> or <ittm:altText>
- [imsc] ttp:displayAspectRatio is prohibited
- [imsc] Should ittp:progressivelyDecodable be deprecated?
- [ttml2] Streaming TTML content can contain links to external resources
- [ttml2] ittp:aspectRatio should be added to TTML2 and deprecated
Sunday, 5 November 2017
- [imsc] fillLineGap improvements
- Closed: [imsc] itts:fillLineGap is unclear about what it is filling between exactly
Saturday, 4 November 2017
Friday, 3 November 2017
- Re: TTML2/TTML1 Backwards compatibility analysis
- TTML2 and Japanese features
- Re: TTML2/TTML1 Backwards compatibility analysis
- Closed: [imsc] Update Abstract to include relationship to TTML2 and deprecation model