- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2017 13:52:00 -0600
- To: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
- Cc: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>, Michael Dolan <mike@dolan.tv>, "public-tt@w3.org" <public-tt@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACQ=j+dHhBFuKrnyG4F=XkXmDvQXj=68fscq=uZm2JqrU=p4pw@mail.gmail.com>
FYI. The TTML1 schemas are published at - http://www.w3.org/2013/09/ttml1/xsd/schema.zip - http://www.w3.org/2013/09/ttml1/rnc/schema.zip These are not under TR but are still permanent, stable URLs. So I suspect this is what Thierry has in mind. On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com> wrote: > Hi Thierry, > > > Publishing those XSD in the W3C space (out of TR) is easy. It is a > stable URI. It has been used for years. > > Can you give an example of a resource "in the W3C space (out of TR)"? > > What is the process for modifying such resources that are referenced in a > REC? > > Thanks, > > -- Pierre > > On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 12:44 AM, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote: > > Please let's have a simple process here. > > > > Publishing those XSD in the W3C space (out of TR) is easy. It is a stable > > URI. It has been used for years. > > > > I prefer this than publishing in Github, which may not be stable and is > not > > user frendly. > > > > Thierry > > > > > > > > > > Le 24/06/2017 à 18:26, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux a écrit : > >> > >> Hi Nigel, > >> > >> It sounds like we are inventing a new process when the WG Note process > >> already exists. > >> > >> Best, > >> > >> -- Pierre > >> > >> On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> On 24 Jun 2017, at 17:20, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi Nigel, > >>>> > >>>>> Why the complexity here? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> I am concerned that modifying the github repo can be done by any > >>>> number of folks, including by mistake. > >>> > >>> > >>> It can; I would suggest tagging a release when we have a known good > state > >>> (as far as we are aware at that time) and declaring the current > operational > >>> release tag in a protected master branch readme file. > >>> > >>> Then any change would only be reflected in a new release by explicit > >>> decision, which could be by Group consensus. > >>> > >>> Nigel > >>> > >>>> > >>>> Revising a WG Note requires group consensus. > >>>> > >>>> I am open to other options. > >>>> > >>>> Best, > >>>> > >>>> -- Pierre > >>>> > >>>>> On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 2:16 AM, Nigel Megitt < > nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> Why the complexity here? Can't we just publish the GitHub repo > details > >>>>> and host them directly from there? That makes them much easier to > use and > >>>>> update. > >>>>> > >>>>> Nigel > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> On 24 Jun 2017, at 06:45, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Mike, > >>>>>> We don't necessarly need to have a WG Note for this. > >>>>>> We can publish the current schemas files on the W3C site (out of TR) > >>>>>> and that will be good enough. No over burdon. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I propose to host those schemas at > >>>>>> > >>>>>> https://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/IMSC/ttml-imsc1.0.1/xml-schemas/ > >>>>>> > >>>>>> and change the link in the spec to this URI. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thierry > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Le 24/06/2017 à 01:04, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux a écrit : > >>>>>>> Hi Mike, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> put the schemas in a WG Note now and reference it before > publishing > >>>>>>>> IMSC1.0.1. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Ok with me. I would create a separate directory on the IMSC github > >>>>>>> repo to host the WG Note and XSD collection. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Happy to do this by Monday COB, in time for approval on Thursday > and > >>>>>>> the IMSC1.0.1 CR transition, unless significant concerns are > raised. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> This switch might not even be substantive since the XSD are > >>>>>>> informative in IMSC1. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- Pierre > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Michael Dolan <mike@dolan.tv> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> Given the apparent process challenges for updating the informative > >>>>>>>> schemas > >>>>>>>> for IMSC1, I’d like to propose that we do that before publication > of > >>>>>>>> IMSC1.0.1 – put the schemas in a WG Note now and reference it > before > >>>>>>>> publishing IMSC1.0.1. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Mike > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> --------------------------- > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Michael A DOLAN > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> TBT, Inc; PO Box 190 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Del Mar, CA 92014 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> +1-858-882-7497 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> ----------------------------- > >>>>> http://www.bbc.co.uk > >>>>> This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and > >>>>> may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless > >>>>> specifically stated. > >>>>> If you have received it in > >>>>> error, please delete it from your system. > >>>>> Do not use, copy or disclose the > >>>>> information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the > sender > >>>>> immediately. > >>>>> Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails > >>>>> sent or received. > >>>>> Further communication will signify your consent to > >>>>> this. > >>>>> ----------------------------- > >
Received on Sunday, 25 June 2017 19:52:54 UTC